Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:73189 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 94102 invoked from network); 16 Mar 2014 01:45:02 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 16 Mar 2014 01:45:02 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=yohgaki@gmail.com; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=yohgaki@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.217.172 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: yohgaki@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.217.172 mail-lb0-f172.google.com Received: from [209.85.217.172] ([209.85.217.172:49384] helo=mail-lb0-f172.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 55/22-16948-C1205235 for ; Sat, 15 Mar 2014 20:45:01 -0500 Received: by mail-lb0-f172.google.com with SMTP id c11so2775760lbj.17 for ; Sat, 15 Mar 2014 18:44:58 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=FTIDqp9iK+ZWJHMQ+OxEWJZA5pgtf4AtJNMzW6WmIog=; b=QFuEpjPIGRrPYbvbTp7dqTSErJtcG2mkU16DMFpPoIYS0AQzqxqiYaYCHGewN5FG+v 7hz39Nmh3vcuH7BVVqsDtjWbzEhtH7Eu4JwGNsoViaNMjLzjAU4rSjfbMfnxWsyApd7k WW/9Hz/zwOpu9bMsnlwYuTwxKDg+y0juPGocgAZj0xasJjdkcZMCEW9ZQhpyDqUE6BEJ 9xPNKimcaM5HuTPFsQO1CtTtTaz3JSxHjVD720vxtkxed/J7mFTqB7vEGzYZs6x2sELg qRQxGtYLGRrp3MyPMVVFwHp7Tt4YOr8w7nvRxzXtS5agpUSigbzmJOnpr3lnVD8PzCb4 S2Qw== X-Received: by 10.152.120.168 with SMTP id ld8mr11469269lab.12.1394934297993; Sat, 15 Mar 2014 18:44:57 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: yohgaki@gmail.com Received: by 10.112.205.73 with HTTP; Sat, 15 Mar 2014 18:44:17 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <5324FE40.1070704@sugarcrm.com> References: <5324FE40.1070704@sugarcrm.com> Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2014 10:44:17 +0900 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 2RDtLBu2JWS8S-Ll_gCZhwAetYA Message-ID: To: Stas Malyshev Cc: Andrey Andreev , "internals@lists.php.net" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e012281a4512a1404f4af734a Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Revert/extend/postpone original RFC about read_only, lazy_write sessions From: yohgaki@ohgaki.net (Yasuo Ohgaki) --089e012281a4512a1404f4af734a Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Sun, Mar 16, 2014 at 10:28 AM, Stas Malyshev wrote: > >> As noted in it, I don't feel like > >> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/session-lock-ini was handled properly. Lack > >> of attention to it alone is demonstrated by the fact that a total of > >> only 10 people have voted. I hope that this follow-up receives more > >> attention, so that we can avoid a potential mess. > >> > > > > "lazy_write" is not accepted. So you don't need to mention it in the RFC. > > > > The vote result says "yes" on "Read only, lazy write option". Thank you Stas. There are long discussions and I mixed with "unsafe_lock" myself... I'll prepare the patch now and put it in github today. Regards, -- Yasuo Ohgaki yohgaki@ohgaki.net --089e012281a4512a1404f4af734a--