Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:73177
Return-Path: <narf@devilix.net>
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 67285 invoked from network); 15 Mar 2014 18:24:16 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1)
  by localhost with SMTP; 15 Mar 2014 18:24:16 -0000
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=narf@devilix.net; sender-id=pass
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=narf@devilix.net; spf=pass; sender-id=pass
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain devilix.net designates 209.85.160.175 as permitted sender)
X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: narf@devilix.net
X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.160.175 mail-yk0-f175.google.com  
Received: from [209.85.160.175] ([209.85.160.175:62078] helo=mail-yk0-f175.google.com)
	by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP
	id 54/F0-53536-ECA94235 for <internals@lists.php.net>; Sat, 15 Mar 2014 13:24:15 -0500
Received: by mail-yk0-f175.google.com with SMTP id 131so10510367ykp.6
        for <internals@lists.php.net>; Sat, 15 Mar 2014 11:24:12 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=devilix.net; s=google;
        h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
        bh=7whVQa15/MSeMAHrSOZFd2LxDydKmG/IQGpSs5/kEZU=;
        b=oTRB03kUPUD8U4o8TeeVuug000Q3uocD9eC2kPzFzH1UuPG1JMypzRK6ZMzwmPKoxA
         b1Qzu44EI8A2rI2EBbL4xXqfDvK3iV8cmLCqrGfRt7Vlup5+im4qC7oRamKaGpU/M0Ht
         lMR1CF9U+susirS0qk/h6734r8sfyv3n0plgY=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
        h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type;
        bh=7whVQa15/MSeMAHrSOZFd2LxDydKmG/IQGpSs5/kEZU=;
        b=Y4PkgjOxQthcUGp8QJvQs8vRA1wv2zULZ0YnEOsmwAuCfKTxJ61uDHetTjjgJzzA8f
         H71qvIMQw4/3/NHpBIxpWtYbAympJVcnG6PN/ORo1NuyxpWqPFp6QWuOJPB+r1xpjqRx
         x99+Y5RylCaMJGHq3n6+wF9UDS/TlV+rsawlQP7tjriUxuxCaENDWCRzdpTEhg5MXNqv
         5nbYJHRZybSi1E2+g0hU3Eo4ULXvlXG7UlZ/4IPCNdpRv8k/ctY+V4SAVB9EdTDS/KvF
         bSdg6vXowHAAQE+LfXX6CYOl5UfL94GyP9H8U3yCDnDEQIW8jBTjJdVYkYZcLfgAxVtI
         1fHQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmPd9pP2pNtY1EjoT5xMrjf4ppUm13LrmYH3PMYwJ9puZRqS1cDc7emHEnm+vdOjrqlK6w1
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.236.43.9 with SMTP id k9mr21420133yhb.51.1394907851465; Sat,
 15 Mar 2014 11:24:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.170.188.139 with HTTP; Sat, 15 Mar 2014 11:24:11 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2014 20:24:11 +0200
Message-ID: <CAPhkiZw5xWRkc=ofh-nB5ZkjfThZFkH_+pK5RZaQFLKhno7u7A@mail.gmail.com>
To: "internals@lists.php.net" <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Subject: [RFC] Revert/extend/postpone original RFC about read_only, lazy_write sessions
From: narf@devilix.net (Andrey Andreev)

Hello internals,

I'm announcing the following RFC for discussion, with the hope that it
can get through before the PHP 5.6 release:
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/session-read_only-lazy_write

As noted in it, I don't feel like
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/session-lock-ini was handled properly. Lack
of attention to it alone is demonstrated by the fact that a total of
only 10 people have voted. I hope that this follow-up receives more
attention, so that we can avoid a potential mess.

Regards,
Andrey Andreev.