Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:73139
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.217.177 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: yohgaki@gmail.com
In-Reply-To: <CAPhkiZxdUFjWrRm7SAtagLmtZXPDbsXp9Cv13u2ChKLsuuxtgA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAPhkiZx=0Vr5p=7VZJD4PeD0ub-khSVMw3G03QhO8CC4xxm11A@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAGa2bXZTU5HzM4oXyiu0PnS=W2Oz1uLP_BnyWBUXyYUTO0tMYg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAPhkiZz_d_wFPgwwYXJD-A+tz0Uf9KQ6uXNi1HhZGWFF1=W91A@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAGa2bXY86ri7b=rquo8Vbbh5ZoHOkwGBRoPWPup-SVPMu0WEgg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAPhkiZyEqcx+UTPzpyYjz9pxWJnCNDO9pUMQNxvTpnrxmez9nw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAGa2bXb5rLU26NDDHkWDw-FYf=vh2J=LAGFrqU3A3JJpOTY_dA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAPhkiZyyXuqqybs+q8rnp_eJZDU0De2wMqwfv5mWiihr9GsueQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAGa2bXboo3CGOP9x+fW0Q98aniBcXejkGSJv5=qygL9ia67FbA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAPhkiZzaTCE6sR=Rt=4VBmVOCo+uSQMREpf-fg6hWBrbCW+RXQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAGa2bXYWVoX_05BdS0M-V5G+B=4v-W-DPbWT8-vPrtd=gJtcCg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAJ26g5TfiwjECNH_GbU6OCwCJdCCRJxKLUBL6wtw89XNo8P2eg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAGa2bXbeucsEK2X1_wvtY_zMXs6guQAWxEMFhpjhyyOopq3sog@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAEZPtU6J01hP2+xjRUhTY9+rq9dTZyPOv9Mes_Xt0jiogsCE9w@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAPhkiZx3iUo=4cJYkB7KPcD8TMs79kvLBrnBdGUZ4YqTq-+h-Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAPhkiZx_ztbVXFm10_4MSQyqkBDYVqBiCmNBdF4k7N9fev5uLQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAGa2bXafxzFTMRfn16JNDgWm2tPQeuYE8cdqg9BbRsKSy3S1QA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAPhkiZxO44Cj7h_NP-5_ZtixLuFoWJrtdPsRabJHP5yTOrCf5g@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAGa2bXbtMQ2cQoe-X1S=Ab05iS7yph9x6Kw5DjfsHdrNEjGF4w@mail.gmail.com> <CAPhkiZxdUFjWrRm7SAtagLmtZXPDbsXp9Cv13u2ChKLsuuxtgA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2014 10:30:15 +0900
Message-ID: <CAGa2bXZ458+diX3FFh3tw_W28y9MZpipmWrPfQ8obo-Z3n9S8w@mail.gmail.com>
To: Andrey Andreev <narf@devilix.net>
Cc: Pierre Joye <pierre.php@gmail.com>, Patrick Schaaf <bof@bof.de>, 
	internals <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b3441c46a2eab04f48705f1
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: Revert session_serializer_name(), session_gc()
From: yohgaki@ohgaki.net (Yasuo Ohgaki)

--047d7b3441c46a2eab04f48705f1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

Hi Andrey,

On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 8:16 AM, Andrey Andreev <narf@devilix.net> wrote:

> > I think shared lock is useful. It requires additional work to change save
> > handler interface and save handler code. It's a distinct feature from
> > read_only. You can get status via session_status() if you need to know
> > during execution. i.e. If session is started with read_only, you'll get
> > PHP_SESSION_NONE status.
>
> This is a bug.
> A read-only session is not a non-existing session.
>

This is not a bug.

session_start(['read_only'=>true])

is the same as

session_start();
session_commit();

It's much faster because no additional API call nor write to session
storage.


>
> I'm thinking more of something like a SessionHandler::$isReadOnly property.
>
> > I suppose read_only is good enough name for the feature. I appreciate
> better
> > name for it, if there is.
>
> It is a perfect name, no need to change it.
>
> >
> > Although I would not like to propose/implement the RFC now, but I may
> > implement it if RFC passes.
>
> Great, I'll count on that. :)


I have to think about the use case if it's really useful, but I may
implement  shared lock if RFC passes.

Regards,

--
Yasuo Ohgaki
yohgaki@ohgaki.net

--047d7b3441c46a2eab04f48705f1--