Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:72999
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.215.45 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: yohgaki@gmail.com
In-Reply-To: <CAPhkiZxN3iJ8Xr1MwKxhsAYe1issjDYvccrkpBc8t9yupS9JCA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAPhkiZxN3iJ8Xr1MwKxhsAYe1issjDYvccrkpBc8t9yupS9JCA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 8 Mar 2014 09:44:47 +0900
Message-ID: <CAGa2bXa=QMn1QkSX7viuvPc4sQ7KkACsU+m6pLpn15JQScY9bw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Andrey Andreev <narf@devilix.net>
Cc: "internals@lists.php.net" <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1136c0bcdcad7304f40daf20
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [VOTE] RFC: Introduce session_start() options -
 read_only, unsafe_lock, lazy_write and
From: yohgaki@ohgaki.net (Yasuo Ohgaki)

--001a1136c0bcdcad7304f40daf20
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

Hi Andrey,

On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 8:34 PM, Andrey Andreev <narf@devilix.net> wrote:

> Because this isn't really clear from the RFC ... can I assume that INI
> options can also be passed to session_start()? Having only lazy_write,
> read_only as options would be inconvenient. :)
>

Many people don't like INI. (Although I love INIs :)
Therefore, new options are allowed only as session_start() options.

I don't mind at all having session.read_only=0 as default and users set it
to session.read_only=1, then change it writable either
ini_set('session.read_only', FALSE) or session_start(['read_only'=>FALSE]);
as needed.

I have to propose the change, though.

Regards,

--
Yasuo Ohgaki
yohgaki@ohgaki.net

--001a1136c0bcdcad7304f40daf20--