Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:72990
Return-Path: <narf@devilix.net>
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 57248 invoked from network); 7 Mar 2014 11:34:41 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1)
  by localhost with SMTP; 7 Mar 2014 11:34:41 -0000
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=narf@devilix.net; spf=pass; sender-id=pass
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=narf@devilix.net; sender-id=pass
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain devilix.net designates 209.85.160.176 as permitted sender)
X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: narf@devilix.net
X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.160.176 mail-yk0-f176.google.com  
Received: from [209.85.160.176] ([209.85.160.176:33251] helo=mail-yk0-f176.google.com)
	by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP
	id 73/00-57079-ECEA9135 for <internals@lists.php.net>; Fri, 07 Mar 2014 06:34:40 -0500
Received: by mail-yk0-f176.google.com with SMTP id 19so10329509ykq.7
        for <internals@lists.php.net>; Fri, 07 Mar 2014 03:34:36 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=devilix.net; s=google;
        h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
        bh=fA+e+VA4Q0HNc6u4QnYMA28oQrqFubKQpw1xD+7EoXg=;
        b=JJNA/G7Obi1ENStDuHXpld/JKyI3Syqu5vxZalPmRo1YBUtXNEyvR+J/F9CGdz9CFN
         021LgpH9fX/tc83QerlJBt9tCNlWdHe5Yml1Jyy9A1mXoRBukhJV4EG1/i0TVi4cSbWz
         whLhkxECT4zB4cLI5OgMD6tKqC5xTXL0GwFtc=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
        h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type;
        bh=fA+e+VA4Q0HNc6u4QnYMA28oQrqFubKQpw1xD+7EoXg=;
        b=gcihWp4jYvo5SA4L26Zsl+T4pQSb2t6lUeVvytjN3qjFsNHxo43OjmNsmCVGp//ecf
         lqYSHYL/xmueap19zzsgmvyPxvnHm18iI7QLlX6RDDBGw69aCdk4h0PwFHLVp9jfx+FR
         qpB/jULROULFZDGL0XxVJngBJl4ukckygSLGpp5CFOB+/N1yBAMnZ03+SiJax9nVd1s8
         E9K/MKarB3H4BM4wcPZQjiviqRs74Pz6pQBVWt0q9MmQVTOEEets9bReppFhUadL4t5m
         3rx/YwXwMcuoiBcX6QnktXOvEVeDBmKX7zjAJHfDvx1K9hSAgR1w4z+Yqgn64bAs8ywS
         lrmg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkVPp7RfF5G4qUVTx75gceMM/Dik89eNH2HebmavQY+6NrRS3r3uZ5kfdj5Y60w+LCdkS89
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.236.35.17 with SMTP id t17mr337111yha.138.1394192076453;
 Fri, 07 Mar 2014 03:34:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.170.188.139 with HTTP; Fri, 7 Mar 2014 03:34:36 -0800 (PST)
Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2014 13:34:36 +0200
Message-ID: <CAPhkiZxN3iJ8Xr1MwKxhsAYe1issjDYvccrkpBc8t9yupS9JCA@mail.gmail.com>
To: "internals@lists.php.net" <internals@lists.php.net>, Yasuo Ohgaki <yohgaki@ohgaki.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [VOTE] RFC: Introduce session_start() options -
 read_only, unsafe_lock, lazy_write and
From: narf@devilix.net (Andrey Andreev)

Hi,

Because this isn't really clear from the RFC ... can I assume that INI
options can also be passed to session_start()? Having only lazy_write,
read_only as options would be inconvenient. :)

Cheers,
Andrey.