Newsgroups: php.internals,php.pecl.dev Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:72874 php.pecl.dev:11587 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 96789 invoked from network); 28 Feb 2014 18:32:52 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 28 Feb 2014 18:32:52 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=derick@php.net; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=derick@php.net; spf=unknown; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: unknown (pb1.pair.com: domain php.net does not designate 82.113.146.227 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: derick@php.net X-Host-Fingerprint: 82.113.146.227 xdebug.org Linux 2.6 Received: from [82.113.146.227] ([82.113.146.227:38095] helo=xdebug.org) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 92/96-64896-256D0135 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 2014 13:32:52 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by xdebug.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4A0F610D3B2; Fri, 28 Feb 2014 18:32:44 +0000 (GMT) Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2014 13:32:40 -0500 (EST) X-X-Sender: derick@whisky.home.derickrethans.nl To: Pierre Joye cc: Ferenc Kovacs , PHP Developers Mailing List , PECL Announce In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: User-Agent: Alpine 2.10 (DEB 1266 2009-07-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Stupid and incorrect version checks. From: derick@php.net (Derick Rethans) On Fri, 28 Feb 2014, Pierre Joye wrote: > On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 6:04 PM, Ferenc Kovacs wrote: > > > > > and here is a link to the relevant discussion about this change: > > http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.php.devel/82446 > > And this has been defined for years. So far Derick is the only one to > complain about this check Lies. The thread that discusses that (which is definitely not *years* ago), has at least two other people arguing against an arbitraty block. So not the first. Stop making shit up like "it has been defined for years". > Also this is a pecl issue, not internals btw. I don't care whether you think it is not an internals thing or not. I think it is relevant, as it once again shows how you manage to frustrate contributors. cheers, Derick