Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:72863
Return-Path: <pjsturgeon@gmail.com>
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 67529 invoked from network); 28 Feb 2014 16:12:13 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1)
  by localhost with SMTP; 28 Feb 2014 16:12:13 -0000
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=pjsturgeon@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=pjsturgeon@gmail.com; sender-id=pass
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.217.175 as permitted sender)
X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: pjsturgeon@gmail.com
X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.217.175 mail-lb0-f175.google.com  
Received: from [209.85.217.175] ([209.85.217.175:44638] helo=mail-lb0-f175.google.com)
	by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP
	id 8D/40-64896-C55B0135 for <internals@lists.php.net>; Fri, 28 Feb 2014 11:12:12 -0500
Received: by mail-lb0-f175.google.com with SMTP id w7so2812998lbi.20
        for <internals@lists.php.net>; Fri, 28 Feb 2014 08:12:09 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :cc:content-type;
        bh=6zwcztGjx7zZD1tynffZEhMvluSWwa1LXcVrRxAmWa8=;
        b=YuDso9VADQOwKGF97e+gWy8LqvDlG0AjfbnO4vE7BgkqekGuG/HzwbKrGGIjddHheZ
         Zv1idrUXOV8saeVIcec+RDhVsDWm70veqHTTnZfnwbgrXcqO8WwkbeEkEZuxsp1EibSs
         /xtVsIYdzn5xNGv681hNcpck1y6SWKUbt4HZ4UPWNK6kjb9WOrY2XxBWWCD9DY/s/oT7
         4I65gLAef5m9zQkMUA780r7cSE/N2lB+yJeU+ZlAlazSTRXr+ZiZ44kA3s2efaL7SkPE
         6Fg9ABsL4/F2vhDX+qwwi1TLXsBldzpFeEQ8P/wPvSNXmT6BzQA3xThV46J4dXNiMRpR
         HdRg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.152.6.199 with SMTP id d7mr12058923laa.22.1393603929477;
 Fri, 28 Feb 2014 08:12:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.114.66.44 with HTTP; Fri, 28 Feb 2014 08:12:09 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <001f01cf3490$fadf31e0$f09d95a0$@tutteli.ch>
References: <CAPhkiZzW8g6PORyjrHFRTcUTLre+wM-sckZrNqRknkdgZrpr-w@mail.gmail.com>
	<52D865C7.4070009@sugarcrm.com>
	<CAPhkiZy9nhRAQFPgSfeemO4UT1B6iuozhirwt0wZ=mUaOUOJwQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAPhkiZwzPz48c4gwAWt9ZPATpmLxk8kRL3A+Pd8KrveQabQQ6A@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAPhkiZyXOsx5CrV1QH2DrC9Who==i_CwNTeGQO4-DM0_mExuHw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAPhkiZw1zgNBavNj-H1y_-8Fwnr34jUmu8cNk5jX7krAx29oag@mail.gmail.com>
	<CABDNdAE_-Lv29Q2r1BJgkLD0NutkwxN2AXQgsCZm7TPJKjEmxA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CABDNdAEKXkFL2kqAPXPxjgZLD9toeva9D8emG+Zw2jKn-4Aijg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CADyq6sLJovLcM3LZR_UDQbjN1Ba9wRuzWBMiXHbLJMQc6Kmptw@mail.gmail.com>
	<531044A8.8050002@googlemail.com>
	<CAGAGxbYo4FGBfvAVR89fBE0Cqn_MDkotaNOa1JfY-LJP8oEMjg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CABDNdAFxyOC4gGAseF4Xa_Ukp3w+1NO_nSDBL=k=RhGap=ogEQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<001f01cf3490$fadf31e0$f09d95a0$@tutteli.ch>
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2014 11:12:09 -0500
Message-ID: <CABDNdAH+nHNFYJ+D8wyS2QdSUcz=mm57o_bBqvAg=oM8EY5+1w@mail.gmail.com>
To: Robert Stoll <php@tutteli.ch>
Cc: PHP Developers Mailing List <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Introducing "Array Of" RFC
From: pjsturgeon@gmail.com (Philip Sturgeon)

On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 9:25 AM, Robert Stoll <php@tutteli.ch> wrote:
>
> I brought up that null in an array is a valid use case at the beginning of this discussion and that the RFC should deal
> with such use cases - otherwise it is incomplete. I still claim it is incomplete if this topic is not addressed but I am
> happy if option 2 is implemented later on.
>

Ok. It seems to be fairly well agreed that null should not be in the
array by default, but there may be cases where it can be allowed,
probably with syntax.

A follow-up RFC can be introduced to add an extra symbol to this, if
people want it. I'm going to put the vote through as is and if people
are not happy about Array Of as is they can simply vote no.