Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:72747 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 35387 invoked from network); 21 Feb 2014 19:49:21 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 21 Feb 2014 19:49:21 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=sectoid@gnolltech.org; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=sectoid@gnolltech.org; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gnolltech.org designates 77.120.101.31 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: sectoid@gnolltech.org X-Host-Fingerprint: 77.120.101.31 31.101.120.77.colo.static.dc.volia.com Received: from [77.120.101.31] ([77.120.101.31:57262] helo=jarjar.gnolltech.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 08/13-17822-ABDA7035 for ; Fri, 21 Feb 2014 14:49:15 -0500 Received: from dagon.localnet (unknown [91.224.25.100]) by jarjar.gnolltech.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3DB1B1DF655; Fri, 21 Feb 2014 21:49:09 +0200 (EET) To: internals@lists.php.net Cc: Christopher Jones , Nikita Popov Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2014 21:49:08 +0200 Message-ID: <3095034.S38469PJ60@dagon> User-Agent: KMail/4.11.5 (Linux/3.12-1-amd64; KDE/4.11.3; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <5307AD2D.4030906@oracle.com> References: <3930601.eOsJ67jUeD@dagon> <5307AD2D.4030906@oracle.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Named params status From: sectoid@gnolltech.org (Gleb Golubitsky) On Friday, February 21, 2014 11:46:53 AM Christopher Jones wrote: > > What is the current status of the named params implementation (RFC [1])? > > According to RFC it's under discussion and proposed for 5.6 release. Can > > we > > really expect this feature in 5.6 release? The change will provide the > > great boost of code readability. > > It won't be in PHP 5.6. There's no timeline for it that I've seen. Sad to hear so. What exactly stops from having it in the mainline? > There are various discussions that show the project still has supporters. And can I help somehow with getting this changes up and merged? WBR, Gleb Golubitsky AKA Sectoid Jabber ID: sectoid@gnolltech.com