Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:72591
Return-Path: <narf@devilix.net>
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 6368 invoked from network); 14 Feb 2014 11:07:08 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1)
  by localhost with SMTP; 14 Feb 2014 11:07:08 -0000
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=narf@devilix.net; spf=pass; sender-id=pass
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=narf@devilix.net; sender-id=pass
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain devilix.net designates 209.85.213.49 as permitted sender)
X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: narf@devilix.net
X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.213.49 mail-yh0-f49.google.com  
Received: from [209.85.213.49] ([209.85.213.49:32995] helo=mail-yh0-f49.google.com)
	by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP
	id B3/34-12906-CD8FDF25 for <internals@lists.php.net>; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 06:07:08 -0500
Received: by mail-yh0-f49.google.com with SMTP id t59so11390065yho.36
        for <internals@lists.php.net>; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 03:07:04 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=devilix.net; s=google;
        h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
        bh=sOizYKyBmh1XN2qfvw3ezZFrSIZRCv+TT+Al09gfuMc=;
        b=k7NFj3azgalicDOwiNjh27tnBDypbLZuRSFdCxXuWQmM9fhyVKV7kkhWz6v94TXzaw
         uY/CyPCcMJqtMV3rH+AFfjCMrokTr0k05RGywxELxopV+hBTorXyjKfDIcYyF3GXWA4C
         kzd4w808NTW+LiCWYkztT7Iu8mv77AlpUM5o8=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
        h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type;
        bh=sOizYKyBmh1XN2qfvw3ezZFrSIZRCv+TT+Al09gfuMc=;
        b=Zo4h3dkXjk+rJ63hqV/JKDI12f3500M2GjCL5WfkLsOWMJjnUMYIxExMdvaC6YSl/q
         WDMCRgTIwrpS6uMc/unJ0G61a9GIBYauyD1HFRi7eHc4ekHcpRwrmxotjZms3EUq2MU1
         PWjcJJb4KnUl0s4YkbEVj2Os47ewI40QMJNLjIkNmuy+3o+CjPKleYKiohZ1eeV8IYyX
         nhsPphtf5ySi+O8FwiklAa/W/TNL9MTAf0uXj15VtG3aBDQUW+orFoq+Mu3iDVXwbpwx
         Op7H6N3oTXxVOmhRofOMadd0VHjfV8xJd4BccQy2t1pwvrni1oIw6Dq/u6X8U2F22egF
         o6hw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQn9m/nnMTWd45/mPXcfFvaFVsakKZC6MIqgYZd5+WRMzUBvAN+t2neDiPnxnfpH1xkiPbk8
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.236.62.194 with SMTP id y42mr2315433yhc.54.1392376024059;
 Fri, 14 Feb 2014 03:07:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.170.49.147 with HTTP; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 03:07:04 -0800 (PST)
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 13:07:04 +0200
Message-ID: <CAPhkiZx_0h3i-FxynzC6BMMP2b2MRVkF34qqxyO042sU1HSuUA@mail.gmail.com>
To: "internals@lists.php.net" <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Combined Comparison Operator
From: narf@devilix.net (Andrey Andreev)

Hi,
I'd also rather see this as a function instead of an operator.
Arguments for that have already been given, but also not least because
of consistency - all comparison operators currently return boolean.

Cheers,
Andrey.