Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:72536 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 2967 invoked from network); 13 Feb 2014 01:58:20 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 13 Feb 2014 01:58:20 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=yohgaki@gmail.com; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=yohgaki@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.215.41 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: yohgaki@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.215.41 mail-la0-f41.google.com Received: from [209.85.215.41] ([209.85.215.41:36241] helo=mail-la0-f41.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id F2/8F-19387-BB62CF25 for ; Wed, 12 Feb 2014 20:58:20 -0500 Received: by mail-la0-f41.google.com with SMTP id mc6so7736413lab.14 for ; Wed, 12 Feb 2014 17:58:17 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=fV/LEBHXmHiQd+Na9RMMTqcPfdRhQqLRlWNBbP8ax+A=; b=RELTFYoeyDESDqrYhXEWcNWB5/KkaB4damGlg2n3IT4KWJNKHtaxjJcLoRbejWPzic 7ceTQ8qmrrsWdp3mVQQvhMaFa55wTPUGos3jO0+TdWb39dNozLYKirTmeDmH5Xu4AxE7 M9Cu21gtnmBLujp9Yt3MXpMveFkU1IrDkp8vssLCfJ89n7fTPmv1rsjP6XJAvygIH4il Fs+CZm2UB+aaVrVnA1wppA5gx5rG0eUg6WkHdw5X7k17CqPa2KYe97N66VXGKYGT4qcT 1G+smOIV7L8xUSnpBZEW+KC0THD1oK02CEoUhr6gaLblGEwOastrLq2k7iXdqrGO50LV 8czQ== X-Received: by 10.112.164.35 with SMTP id yn3mr164303lbb.45.1392256696919; Wed, 12 Feb 2014 17:58:16 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: yohgaki@gmail.com Received: by 10.112.199.37 with HTTP; Wed, 12 Feb 2014 17:57:36 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 10:57:36 +0900 X-Google-Sender-Auth: z16mu4LYJkByhQhWSfduzl5s4PE Message-ID: To: "internals@lists.php.net" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c33530db2ab704f24005f3 Subject: [RFC DISCUSSION] Have voting options to show reason why dislike proposal. From: yohgaki@ohgaki.net (Yasuo Ohgaki) --001a11c33530db2ab704f24005f3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Hi all, We have number of RFC that has been declined. It's good we agree not to introduce proposal. However, it's not good we don't see the reason why. Since RFC is technical discussion, there should be good reasons to oppose proposals and these opinions should be used to improve/create another RFC. I would like to propose RFC to have vote for the reason why user voted "no" for the RFC. Additionally, we may have comment plugin to explains the reason why. Users who would like to vote "no" for a RFC, they should explain during discussion period or when voting at least. This way, we would have more constructive RFC process. Any comments? Regards, -- Yasuo Ohgaki yohgaki@ohgaki.net --001a11c33530db2ab704f24005f3--