Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:72439
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 74.125.82.50 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAGa2bXYU0+eVgnDCkqpG6AWvLCX9gV3+5nzoeD-RJge8Rtw-dQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAGa2bXYU0+eVgnDCkqpG6AWvLCX9gV3+5nzoeD-RJge8Rtw-dQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2014 15:16:44 +0100
Message-ID: <CALtuQzBZE=p6MNdSA9PbNJPz3PtF5jhtfB0a5Zhp=4AwkzQ3nA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Yasuo Ohgaki <yohgaki@ohgaki.net>
Cc: "internals@lists.php.net" <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c28dccabca1004f20dff95
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] No PHP tags
From: krebs.seb@gmail.com (Sebastian Krebs)

--001a11c28dccabca1004f20dff95
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

2014-02-10 8:35 GMT+01:00 Yasuo Ohgaki <yohgaki@ohgaki.net>:

> Hi all,
>
> "Optional PHP tags by php.ini and CLI options" RFC has been discussed very
> long time.
>
> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/nophptags
>
> I would like to know is there anyone who would like not to have
> this.


I sooo much don't care. But with the many downsides in mind I'd keep it.


> I think it's good counter measure for LFI, but you might have
> different perspective.
>
> If it is possible, I would like to address as much as opinions possible
> before voting.
>
> Are there anyone who think we should have this?
> What is the reason?
>
> Thank you
>
> --
> Yasuo Ohgaki
> yohgaki@ohgaki.net
>



-- 
github.com/KingCrunch

--001a11c28dccabca1004f20dff95--