Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:72437
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain ajf.me designates 198.187.29.233 as permitted sender)
Message-ID: <52F8C50E.4040006@ajf.me>
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2014 12:24:46 +0000
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Yasuo Ohgaki <yohgaki@ohgaki.net>, 
 "internals@lists.php.net" <internals@lists.php.net>
References: <CAGa2bXYU0+eVgnDCkqpG6AWvLCX9gV3+5nzoeD-RJge8Rtw-dQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAGa2bXYU0+eVgnDCkqpG6AWvLCX9gV3+5nzoeD-RJge8Rtw-dQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] No PHP tags
From: ajf@ajf.me (Andrea Faulds)



On 10/02/14 07:35, Yasuo Ohgaki wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> "Optional PHP tags by php.ini and CLI options" RFC has been discussed very
> long time.
>
> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/nophptags
>
> I would like to know is there anyone who would like not to have
> this. I think it's good counter measure for LFI, but you might have
> different perspective.
>
> If it is possible, I would like to address as much as opinions possible
> before voting.
>
> Are there anyone who think we should have this?
> What is the reason?
>
> Thank you

I support the idea in principle; I think it's silly that files which are 
entirely code need to have <?php at the start. But it's impractical to 
implement, and hey, <?php means PHP code has its own magic number :)

-- 
Andrea Faulds
http://ajf.me/