Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:72407 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 90977 invoked from network); 8 Feb 2014 16:14:44 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 8 Feb 2014 16:14:44 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=thruska@cubiclesoft.com; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=thruska@cubiclesoft.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain cubiclesoft.com designates 74.208.44.107 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: thruska@cubiclesoft.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 74.208.44.107 u15404699.onlinehome-server.com Received: from [74.208.44.107] ([74.208.44.107:37497] helo=u15404699.onlinehome-server.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 48/31-17765-CE756F25 for ; Sat, 08 Feb 2014 11:14:38 -0500 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (Authenticated sender: thruska@cubiclesoft.com) with ESMTPSA id 1F7A75000B06 Message-ID: <52F657E4.4030603@cubiclesoft.com> Date: Sat, 08 Feb 2014 09:14:28 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120327 Thunderbird/11.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: PHP Development References: <52F61A78.1020401@lsces.co.uk> <52F62B08.6050201@ajf.me> <52F63DDE.6090600@lsces.co.uk> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Security Diligence From: thruska@cubiclesoft.com (Thomas Hruska) On 2/8/2014 7:26 AM, Pierre Joye wrote: > Lester, this is not a support list. > > It is your good right to stick with dead PHP versions and 10 years old > code (whether it is your choice or not), but it is definitively not > good to constantly posts totally off topic posts, replies or complains > about what we do or don't. It is even more annoying in cases where you > clearly do not understand the underlying reasons of one feature or > another. > > That being said, I would love to see you actually contribute something > for a change. How about giving Lester a hard-and-fast deadline to contribute something useful by? (Being sure to clearly define "useful" in the process.) If he fails to meet the expectations by the deadline, he gets unceremoniously booted off the list. But who am I to make such a suggestion? Make the same rule applicable to everyone who hasn't contributed something useful, which inevitably would apply to me as well. I'm cool with that though. I've got at least one thing I'd like to see in PHP and it would force the issue thus causing me to actually sit down and hammer out the code I've got good intentions to write but never seem to get to. -- Thomas Hruska CubicleSoft President I've got great, time saving software that you will find useful. http://cubiclesoft.com/