Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:72298
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.215.49 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: yohgaki@gmail.com
In-Reply-To: <CAGa2bXYpdS580K+xeh92w+GFApDHF7db_QE3gpnOHOb0bTHPaA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <52EE2B66.4040005@pthreads.org> <CAGa2bXYJT+qXRXinxd_hqgPG0UfWkvCH0f6sgLyzSjM2X57j0g@mail.gmail.com>
 <CALtuQzAt_FaZwQpfJM9ed1JJSQAWb2bgP=R+hQfnVkZxZLpREw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAGa2bXa5zON7-A6LST7yyWBrJ8ZKP7eeSSiQM-DpqNbOnrdveA@mail.gmail.com>
 <52F157BE.3020804@ajf.me> <CAGa2bXafeGSQ1X7TUsQYnnASqyBPjyT1nh=yPM9LdbW3nY3Gmg@mail.gmail.com>
 <52F15FD6.7060901@ajf.me> <CAGa2bXZvEN0KULW3MBR6y+wFKDiHOw7dXqsBeMZVYNNAXXYg2A@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAGa2bXYLkvdPXGcC=G93EKQPUBxCCKLcx-FHUK3Kt8NasD5Cvw@mail.gmail.com>
 <52F1E58F.3050105@sugarcrm.com> <CAGa2bXanYKsciVPwu30SA0HvHWDRJhv5AcG-B00+2h=fq_CUfg@mail.gmail.com>
 <52F1EF12.2050705@sugarcrm.com> <CAGa2bXYWXQUoZL20-wdRBjw98KwzbjiAKOmmmdduC_+517Pxpw@mail.gmail.com>
 <52F1F675.2000600@sugarcrm.com> <CAGa2bXY+RsovH-CfOZntzwyY_+QEJV+Ocb=Dc69QSh9+GeS6Ug@mail.gmail.com>
 <52F20D8B.9000003@gmail.com> <CAGa2bXYJTP-UrVFD=PBwT=4gU0PNGQhHa=8uRusQgmTnNJ6Xgw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAGa2bXYpdS580K+xeh92w+GFApDHF7db_QE3gpnOHOb0bTHPaA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2014 06:17:34 +0900
Message-ID: <CAGa2bXbQ3kK2tuaYw7pLVJSod+3fWQLxUow6GGchqkJp7t1_xg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Rowan Collins <rowan.collins@gmail.com>
Cc: "internals@lists.php.net" <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c239be73a2ce04f1af4b7d
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] RE: RFC: expectations/assertions
From: yohgaki@ohgaki.net (Yasuo Ohgaki)

--001a11c239be73a2ce04f1af4b7d
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 6:10 AM, Yasuo Ohgaki <yohgaki@ohgaki.net> wrote:

> On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 5:49 AM, Yasuo Ohgaki <yohgaki@ohgaki.net> wrote:
>
>> I agree, some thing like this is needed to call closure or pass arguments
>> to assert() then call.
>
>
> If we allow to pass arguments, it would be something like
>
> assert(
>   function($arg1, $arg2) {
>     return $arg1 > $arg2;
>   },
>   'Do not pass bad value',
>   [$arg1, $arg2]
> )
>

Since we don't have 3 parameters signature for assert() now

assert(
  [$arg1, $arg2],
  function($arg1, $arg2) {
    return $arg1 > $arg2;
  },
  'Do not pass bad value'
);

is possible. Could we have this?

Regards,

--
Yasuo Ohgaki
yohgaki@ohgaki.net

--001a11c239be73a2ce04f1af4b7d--