Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:72297 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 80583 invoked from network); 5 Feb 2014 21:11:07 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 5 Feb 2014 21:11:07 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=yohgaki@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=yohgaki@gmail.com; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.217.173 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: yohgaki@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.217.173 mail-lb0-f173.google.com Received: from [209.85.217.173] ([209.85.217.173:53530] helo=mail-lb0-f173.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 91/68-38005-9E8A2F25 for ; Wed, 05 Feb 2014 16:11:07 -0500 Received: by mail-lb0-f173.google.com with SMTP id y6so780561lbh.18 for ; Wed, 05 Feb 2014 13:11:02 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=OGHZ59YvweV0z9vQq207EvECcXA9sAMCCbCfOPcIijg=; b=dMkPbGZQFKDC2ssBE5FsASeVnw+vzvLErmnKEfUeXVVWVhBUMg7DraM2XoQ2P+MF5p 0yO82Nho2kJeTLb+G72HOQKDrwkzLmugcj/Wsfxbr3tX549qfdB8NUuUoaoNv3Ul4AHA 2wvGrXSWuAmf0XTUUorhrj5Bk8/d3eY1S06KA/iwIoWvba2upaAYnoODrwEBgV5j3giy +vR6cFPmEssXVQtF+W7O7pPA/cLyR/4MXqMnJd1GqW2xPEBGqEIzKeO9sX4EG9HGyG/l yjjk5XI3gZwCa1N6vCzvOQv/J1Ug/q66P0L484yOkLaHLurx4ofkGLmzFENO7JLn9VUI /g1g== X-Received: by 10.152.1.130 with SMTP id 2mr1408lam.88.1391634662743; Wed, 05 Feb 2014 13:11:02 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: yohgaki@gmail.com Received: by 10.112.199.37 with HTTP; Wed, 5 Feb 2014 13:10:22 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <52EE2B66.4040005@pthreads.org> <52F157BE.3020804@ajf.me> <52F15FD6.7060901@ajf.me> <52F1E58F.3050105@sugarcrm.com> <52F1EF12.2050705@sugarcrm.com> <52F1F675.2000600@sugarcrm.com> <52F20D8B.9000003@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2014 06:10:22 +0900 X-Google-Sender-Auth: BFzTsifbKnxnZYFgWURN0SbAd8k Message-ID: To: Rowan Collins Cc: "internals@lists.php.net" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e013c674ebae45204f1af316f Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] RE: RFC: expectations/assertions From: yohgaki@ohgaki.net (Yasuo Ohgaki) --089e013c674ebae45204f1af316f Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 5:49 AM, Yasuo Ohgaki wrote: > I agree, some thing like this is needed to call closure or pass arguments > to assert() then call. If we allow to pass arguments, it would be something like assert( function($arg1, $arg2) { return $arg1 > $arg2; }, 'Do not pass bad value', [$arg1, $arg2] ); It looks nicer than assert( ($f = function($arg1, $arg2) { return $arg1 > $arg2; }) && ($f($arg1, $arg2)), 'Do not pass bad value' ); Regards, -- Yasuo Ohgaki yohgaki@ohgaki.net --089e013c674ebae45204f1af316f--