Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:72272
Return-Path: <cryptocompress@googlemail.com>
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 22335 invoked from network); 5 Feb 2014 13:47:02 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1)
  by localhost with SMTP; 5 Feb 2014 13:47:02 -0000
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=cryptocompress@googlemail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=cryptocompress@googlemail.com; sender-id=pass
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain googlemail.com designates 209.85.215.179 as permitted sender)
X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: cryptocompress@googlemail.com
X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.215.179 mail-ea0-f179.google.com  
Received: from [209.85.215.179] ([209.85.215.179:59183] helo=mail-ea0-f179.google.com)
	by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP
	id CA/87-09402-4D042F25 for <internals@lists.php.net>; Wed, 05 Feb 2014 08:47:01 -0500
Received: by mail-ea0-f179.google.com with SMTP id q10so202635ead.10
        for <internals@lists.php.net>; Wed, 05 Feb 2014 05:46:58 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=googlemail.com; s=20120113;
        h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject
         :references:in-reply-to:content-type;
        bh=CGNyI7rUa7vhxteAw+8cmjaXrmXht65ijKcOUIdxvsU=;
        b=EWh+HUkrH6UpCQ0CoG/YZlv99/l03KIMUDXDU09MAYHjqKIttp5uhnriV6TxfwMmOA
         IxI/sweVuC8pHA8A4WjpLW4Wlw0wXXzr9Z9tefGFznuP01djPbIIxMATQYwPytv3IIaC
         rvu7cRBOEJfxxQbPJASFR18xXOYfxJ6v24ywFMupmy+UHGS0wFG0BOv8E/nllOfaIe9n
         Y//BF1fSGCNxSWt+xRWUbvXsqizVznrym0d37qgR786U37beO45ZBQPWbWxq7aDdRC/B
         OdLMocqtCtgMLomlRrJTTs6jjP7woeKCBU2/42gasq3evkoFvVMcijqGQxkzV+DcftTk
         jKJg==
X-Received: by 10.15.36.196 with SMTP id i44mr2123359eev.104.1391608018263;
        Wed, 05 Feb 2014 05:46:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.115] (mnch-5d856266.pool.mediaWays.net. [93.133.98.102])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id b41sm102411142eef.16.2014.02.05.05.46.55
        for <multiple recipients>
        (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
        Wed, 05 Feb 2014 05:46:56 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <52F240CA.3080909@googlemail.com>
Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2014 14:46:50 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Yasuo Ohgaki <yohgaki@ohgaki.net>, tjerk.meesters@gmail.com
CC: Sara Golemon <pollita@php.net>, 
 PHP Developers Mailing List <internals@lists.php.net>
References: <CAESVnVq3PB+OFXGR+yJ1L2BuX_4+pHyjjvJ8rZXnxexXozyT4A@mail.gmail.com> <CAGfRu7Ot_sNhvQY1b18Wb-7UB3uihXsSXPVb=cHhEhA0s4ijVQ@mail.gmail.com> <52F00437.7010903@googlemail.com> <CAGa2bXanS9VY0j8JQ4oGkEFHmbof-gDmBtpHDMuhMK_K0CEMJg@mail.gmail.com> <52F005E6.6090702@googlemail.com> <CAGa2bXa-BHmwbyqBQJgoNqoy=CLppJ8GYp2__GGdkpk6UttuMQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAGa2bXboT_7rVX7c02hmtYtdjF=_FtX-P7aRT5JFvjEb22JJYg@mail.gmail.com> <CAESVnVrRsByJ00xU+R35aSH8KF6Xa14O2_weTUGEY5t20+HTtg@mail.gmail.com> <52F0D36B.7010905@googlemail.com> <CAHMUw2GdXC6ymrpiA=QXQbfzDTssVKDOVh3SXXPO29owHW9u6A@mail.gmail.com> <CAGa2bXaP0V_aChGipAUvJYhmO2Qugr0HOo3kTY1P2A+=rmyNnA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAGa2bXaP0V_aChGipAUvJYhmO2Qugr0HOo3kTY1P2A+=rmyNnA@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
 boundary="------------020601010106070107090508"
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] [VOTE] __debugInfo()
From: cryptocompress@googlemail.com (Crypto Compress)

--------------020601010106070107090508
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Hi!

>     > 1. Can this hook be bypassed or disabled (global/temporary)?
>     > e.g. real_var_dump(), ini setting, some other flag?
>     >
>     > 2. What will be affected by this hook beside "var_dump"?
>     > e.g. xdebug output, var_export, ...
>     >
>     > 3. How would this behave (segfault?):
>     > public function __debugInfo() { var_dump($this); return []; }
>     >
>
>     Yeah, there doesn't seem to be any recursion protection, just like:
>
>     public function __toString() { return (string)$this; }
>
>
> It is the same as
>
> function f() {
>   f();
> }
>
> User may do that, but it's a documentation problem.
> It would be not obvious as function call recursion.
> and must be documented, probably.
>

var_dump has *no* recursion check unlike print_r

--------------020601010106070107090508--