Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:72234
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.215.49 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: yohgaki@gmail.com
In-Reply-To: <CAFMT4NpuGvkU7-K0k56uU-_kS1Q+Y22hW9COz7RMR6XUg0newA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAFMT4NoVaG_sDoLt7=AzRK1qCWyLOxjusDXmtw0M-Txcwk4jLg@mail.gmail.com>
 <52F18A4F.9030800@ajf.me> <CAFMT4NpuGvkU7-K0k56uU-_kS1Q+Y22hW9COz7RMR6XUg0newA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2014 11:15:50 +0900
Message-ID: <CAGa2bXb-yb6HQ8zrwO4erF7VRR9Vq0j0QREsKAVXEvE8UTPFOg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Levi Morrison <morrison.levi@gmail.com>
Cc: Andrea Faulds <ajf@ajf.me>, internals <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1134425048d41e04f19f580c
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] RFCs: length of voting process.
From: yohgaki@ohgaki.net (Yasuo Ohgaki)

--001a1134425048d41e04f19f580c
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

Hi Levi,

On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 10:58 AM, Levi Morrison <morrison.levi@gmail.com>wrote:

> >
> > I don't find any problem with a week being the voting period. You already
> > have, at the very least, 2 weeks prior to any vote to discuss the RFC.
> >
>
>  Except its fairly often that people change the RFC within this window so
> when it goes to vote you have to review stuff. And if you are busy that
> week then... well, you miss the vote.


This is because people tends to read RFC when voting.
To address this issue, close vote, discuss, reopen vote, is the
way to go. Reopened vote should be a week or more. Minimum
2 weeks seems too much to me.

Regards,

--
Yasuo Ohgaki
yohgaki@ohgaki.net

--001a1134425048d41e04f19f580c--