Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:72232 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 99879 invoked from network); 5 Feb 2014 01:58:56 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 5 Feb 2014 01:58:56 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=morrison.levi@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=morrison.levi@gmail.com; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.214.171 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: morrison.levi@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.214.171 mail-ob0-f171.google.com Received: from [209.85.214.171] ([209.85.214.171:50745] helo=mail-ob0-f171.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id C7/92-12415-FDA91F25 for ; Tue, 04 Feb 2014 20:58:56 -0500 Received: by mail-ob0-f171.google.com with SMTP id wp4so10553761obc.30 for ; Tue, 04 Feb 2014 17:58:53 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=AFEkAgk27et2Lef2JrTswlHmDR3ff9p5by3HvSW1wMo=; b=foUogYF7Df+rY82V8T4FZaI0lIQFDEjPMxIeYFsxk7BYacUKRpLQDQwlo8KPg+c43o +G8icFmFjBH6hPn6IXxWG01eAhKiWn2bJit5h6fmA5/t1vboUCbGUyi/KJaLEFN8Ok+R 3v8Up6X96YirNSkRWNSTWLENTiC7qNiX7naS4xbxowv+6p6wnfs6PKrl7IBX3lRJoJ3g J5FMzhXbSqUgO1DnBviylHi4jjnA5id1hQEXZ4ikU710pRQy5jjk1DDLpN0u3ZTrhtUw n8ehMkjYBkX0l6ZVZxGV7f3XlHJpHIs7Lbk520S+Ck+5vAKklAuONe0BYgyfC+QWy5X0 oQMw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.182.232.4 with SMTP id tk4mr39554902obc.9.1391565533074; Tue, 04 Feb 2014 17:58:53 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.76.77.8 with HTTP; Tue, 4 Feb 2014 17:58:53 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <52F18A4F.9030800@ajf.me> References: <52F18A4F.9030800@ajf.me> Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2014 18:58:53 -0700 Message-ID: To: Andrea Faulds Cc: internals Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d0445178f47de9f04f19f19fe Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] RFCs: length of voting process. From: morrison.levi@gmail.com (Levi Morrison) --f46d0445178f47de9f04f19f19fe Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > > I don't find any problem with a week being the voting period. You already > have, at the very least, 2 weeks prior to any vote to discuss the RFC. > Except its fairly often that people change the RFC within this window so when it goes to vote you have to review stuff. And if you are busy that week then... well, you miss the vote. --f46d0445178f47de9f04f19f19fe--