Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:72224
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.216.43 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAFMT4NoVaG_sDoLt7=AzRK1qCWyLOxjusDXmtw0M-Txcwk4jLg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAFMT4NoVaG_sDoLt7=AzRK1qCWyLOxjusDXmtw0M-Txcwk4jLg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2014 00:01:06 +0100
Message-ID: <CAEZPtU4VvGU_svMiZL951_b7ask6hz+RckerJyJb9wXAu59Yhw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Levi Morrison <levim@php.net>
Cc: PHP internals <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1134f40c8328fb04f19c9d33
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] RFCs: length of voting process.
From: pierre.php@gmail.com (Pierre Joye)

--001a1134f40c8328fb04f19c9d33
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

Hi,

On Feb 4, 2014 10:47 PM, "Levi Morrison" <levim@php.net> wrote:
>
> I propose that we increase the minimum duration for an RFC to be in the
> voting phase from one week to something longer. The rationale is quite
> simple:
>   - One week is often not enough time for me to review my current thoughts
> and vote.
>   - Sometimes when RFCs go to vote it is the first time I get to read
about
> it. Most of us don't work on PHP full-time so I can't be the only one in
> this situation.
>   - During holiday seasons people often request a longer window anyway.
>
> As for picking a new period: I propose 14 days (two weeks) because it
> guarantees two weekends.
>
> What voting window would you like to see?

I think a week is fine given that two weeks for  discussion are  required.
nd it uses to be longer.

> Also, do we need an RFC for proposals like this?

Yes

--001a1134f40c8328fb04f19c9d33--