Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:72219 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 59452 invoked from network); 4 Feb 2014 21:47:05 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 4 Feb 2014 21:47:05 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=morrison.levi@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=morrison.levi@gmail.com; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.214.179 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: morrison.levi@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.214.179 mail-ob0-f179.google.com Received: from [209.85.214.179] ([209.85.214.179:46973] helo=mail-ob0-f179.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 77/26-13782-8DF51F25 for ; Tue, 04 Feb 2014 16:47:05 -0500 Received: by mail-ob0-f179.google.com with SMTP id wo20so10217011obc.38 for ; Tue, 04 Feb 2014 13:47:02 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=qnbXjwqQ0eL36D4usfE03eRC5VTVfdkadfy2WAp6sFA=; b=OuqKEb98cq6CwCMccHMMR20LWbtOVKBruyzqxyxYcZtnqyXPzVAVdFFRr8BSxGxY13 +e2K/o4wPsVdf3PGuwgHPsO4wcSVnvGBK8rreG54mb0rSKvI+l1E6Tj23wlO0qhbTYJY Mx1ri5RVRX21FgwGx1JArXcJdJYNX3GHK/LGTop4uHdN9h18VdHPwBeEOeOzBp2Vx0bu JOYOd7pu+Fw8uEcvXaExqWys9FTP+m5jlkYQsWZV4vgkIGa+LSMi/C1Ov5hVH5zL54SL 3BGtyVveoaZxYuYbo8FCH+5ekamlqjso7oFLqYRSGDaZgkWEtnClxLUxwxDgqo9EaKxE ShWw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.182.135.194 with SMTP id pu2mr13952392obb.38.1391550422084; Tue, 04 Feb 2014 13:47:02 -0800 (PST) Sender: morrison.levi@gmail.com Received: by 10.76.77.8 with HTTP; Tue, 4 Feb 2014 13:47:02 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2014 14:47:02 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: OSQhPdmF58iz7TuRTNclDXS0U4A Message-ID: To: internals Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e0122a6c098710404f19b944d Subject: RFCs: length of voting process. From: levim@php.net (Levi Morrison) --089e0122a6c098710404f19b944d Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 I propose that we increase the minimum duration for an RFC to be in the voting phase from one week to something longer. The rationale is quite simple: - One week is often not enough time for me to review my current thoughts and vote. - Sometimes when RFCs go to vote it is the first time I get to read about it. Most of us don't work on PHP full-time so I can't be the only one in this situation. - During holiday seasons people often request a longer window anyway. As for picking a new period: I propose 14 days (two weeks) because it guarantees two weekends. What voting window would you like to see? Also, do we need an RFC for proposals like this? The wiki is unclear on how we deal with changes to the RFC process. --089e0122a6c098710404f19b944d--