Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:72181 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 44381 invoked from network); 4 Feb 2014 07:54:39 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 4 Feb 2014 07:54:39 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=lester@lsces.co.uk; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=lester@lsces.co.uk; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain lsces.co.uk from 217.147.176.204 cause and error) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: lester@lsces.co.uk X-Host-Fingerprint: 217.147.176.204 mail4.serversure.net Linux 2.6 Received: from [217.147.176.204] ([217.147.176.204:54595] helo=mail4.serversure.net) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 40/86-09069-EBC90F25 for ; Tue, 04 Feb 2014 02:54:38 -0500 Received: (qmail 32141 invoked by uid 89); 4 Feb 2014 07:54:35 -0000 Received: by simscan 1.3.1 ppid: 32135, pid: 32138, t: 0.0551s scanners: attach: 1.3.1 clamav: 0.96/m:52 Received: from unknown (HELO linux-dev4.lsces.org.uk) (lester@rainbowdigitalmedia.org.uk@81.138.11.136) by mail4.serversure.net with ESMTPA; 4 Feb 2014 07:54:35 -0000 Message-ID: <52F09D64.9020803@lsces.co.uk> Date: Tue, 04 Feb 2014 07:57:24 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:26.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/26.0 SeaMonkey/2.23 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Pierre Joye CC: PHP internals References: <344075933.20140203143339@figureone.com> <617796370.20140204005840@cypressintegrated.com> <52F098F7.7000901@lsces.co.uk> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: Windows Peer Verification From: lester@lsces.co.uk (Lester Caine) Pierre Joye wrote: >> Security is not the >> >only thing that is reliant nowadays on third party data? > We bundle the TZ data and it is used on all supported platforms. So > no, no platform lags behind other. Some distributions may patch the > date extension to use the system TZ but then it is none of our > business. But that is the whole point here ... it's the same argument with CA file? -- Lester Caine - G8HFL ----------------------------- Contact - http://lsces.co.uk/wiki/?page=contact L.S.Caine Electronic Services - http://lsces.co.uk EnquirySolve - http://enquirysolve.com/ Model Engineers Digital Workshop - http://medw.co.uk Rainbow Digital Media - http://rainbowdigitalmedia.co.uk