Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:72180 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 42929 invoked from network); 4 Feb 2014 07:52:34 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 4 Feb 2014 07:52:34 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=lester@lsces.co.uk; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=lester@lsces.co.uk; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain lsces.co.uk from 217.147.176.204 cause and error) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: lester@lsces.co.uk X-Host-Fingerprint: 217.147.176.204 mail4.serversure.net Linux 2.6 Received: from [217.147.176.204] ([217.147.176.204:54581] helo=mail4.serversure.net) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 3C/26-09069-04C90F25 for ; Tue, 04 Feb 2014 02:52:33 -0500 Received: (qmail 31839 invoked by uid 89); 4 Feb 2014 07:52:28 -0000 Received: by simscan 1.3.1 ppid: 31833, pid: 31836, t: 0.0664s scanners: attach: 1.3.1 clamav: 0.96/m:52 Received: from unknown (HELO linux-dev4.lsces.org.uk) (lester@rainbowdigitalmedia.org.uk@81.138.11.136) by mail4.serversure.net with ESMTPA; 4 Feb 2014 07:52:28 -0000 Message-ID: <52F09CE5.4070106@lsces.co.uk> Date: Tue, 04 Feb 2014 07:55:17 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:26.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/26.0 SeaMonkey/2.23 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: internals@lists.php.net References: <52F00F93.2020505@oracle.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [VOTE] 64 bit platform improvements for string length and integer From: lester@lsces.co.uk (Lester Caine) Pierre Joye wrote: > Jokes apart, given the results 6 will be the target. That follows the > arguments against this RFC and we seriously hope that everyone will > participate earlier and will not bring the same arguments. Hopefully reasons like this will polarise thinking on actually getting a PHP6 build underway, since the repackaging of Unicode has not driven that interest? It is probably worth pointing out how many major versions some of the big frameworks have gone through while PHP5.somthing has been their target, and that these target different PHP5.x requirements. If PHP6 had not been pushed too early would there have not been a different path from PHP5.3 anyway? -- Lester Caine - G8HFL ----------------------------- Contact - http://lsces.co.uk/wiki/?page=contact L.S.Caine Electronic Services - http://lsces.co.uk EnquirySolve - http://enquirysolve.com/ Model Engineers Digital Workshop - http://medw.co.uk Rainbow Digital Media - http://rainbowdigitalmedia.co.uk