Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:72005 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 2823 invoked from network); 2 Feb 2014 17:29:09 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 2 Feb 2014 17:29:09 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=php@golemon.com; spf=softfail; sender-id=softfail Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=php@golemon.com; sender-id=softfail Received-SPF: softfail (pb1.pair.com: domain golemon.com does not designate 209.85.192.169 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: php@golemon.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.192.169 mail-pd0-f169.google.com Received: from [209.85.192.169] ([209.85.192.169:55229] helo=mail-pd0-f169.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 76/5F-30967-3608EE25 for ; Sun, 02 Feb 2014 12:29:08 -0500 Received: by mail-pd0-f169.google.com with SMTP id v10so6031584pde.14 for ; Sun, 02 Feb 2014 09:29:04 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=74Iwkl4wLJi2KAve6PNutkamxxcqAmqai2q7rNLLWVw=; b=IBFa2DZboXuv6mDqS8g+82mxnw20uVVAbjp3CPEc+oPJXvQS6dsGmnf++6Pf9byUsl Pcz+ud5kh6UXabj5alAB/p8Re4ueh7e5XoA/VZ54EwpjnjpAJ4Pos7iCiMWouVjTnDVB zRcImfyYv1kcILusNEHpL0+YndqaJz1N9x5Iz+RvcFbaz89Csttpxa3Dpehrczd3fvNl ENttK6J3Q9h772J9Ruo+Pf7MMtrdJdGCOdbC605j0g/1PKAVqmI2ds2BVZao/o+GVUP6 4kuVCEXumtH2Vt9Xt81wZ1+P4Rx0KdnoMhTcbpYBQjKO6J0VXmTsMOUZNqM9aH6TD66T sO8A== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQl+QZdcMz4el4822Q8Y7xqYIhdO8PC4fu8QgGZPZJj0cQinpH/rN57UKX2AsOYsB/QhIHa0 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.66.248.194 with SMTP id yo2mr26927572pac.51.1391362144866; Sun, 02 Feb 2014 09:29:04 -0800 (PST) Sender: php@golemon.com Received: by 10.70.77.164 with HTTP; Sun, 2 Feb 2014 09:29:04 -0800 (PST) X-Originating-IP: [173.252.71.189] In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sun, 2 Feb 2014 09:29:04 -0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: a8CVhYSFphIKcM9wiycKWh-2p1Y Message-ID: To: Kevin Ingwersen Cc: internals Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] About RFC for deprecated modifier From: pollita@php.net (Sara Golemon) On Sun, Feb 2, 2014 at 8:43 AM, Kevin Ingwersen wrote: > I just wanted to ask what the current status for this RFC is: https://wiki.php.net/rfc/deprecated-modifier > I'd ask Yussuf, but given that it's > 1 year old I'd call the RFC abandoned (until I heard otherwise). That said, I'd be inclined to introduce annotation first, then make "Deprecated" an official annotation which the engine recognized in the way the RFC describes. > Currently, I am just browsing thru the RFCs available. Some of them have actually been implemented (There is one about the $foo=(new bar)->baz syntax thats still listed as in discussion). > That one probably just needs a quick vote. -Sara