Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:71994
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain pthreads.org from 74.125.82.42 cause and error)
Message-ID: <52EE311E.5040508@pthreads.org>
Date: Sun, 02 Feb 2014 11:50:54 +0000
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130625 Thunderbird/17.0.7
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: internals@lists.php.net
References: <52EE2B1D.7000307@pthreads.org>
In-Reply-To: <52EE2B1D.7000307@pthreads.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: RFC: expectations/assertions
From: pthreads@pthreads.org (Joe Watkins)

On 02/02/2014 11:25 AM, Joe Watkins wrote:
> Morning Internals [, and Dmitry :)],
>
>      I came across a reason to think about assertions again today, my
> original, pretty radical, patch was worked on by dmitry, I updated the
> RFC a while ago but allowed the conversation to die down.
>
>      Nikita pointed this out around the same time:
>
>      https://gist.github.com/krakjoe/4a2145e5a6ddc26b1dc1
>
>      Still, there's no reason for us to have a crappy assertion api as
> part of the core just because there's a way around it(-ish) in user land.
>
>      So, I think now is a good time to revive the discussion, the patch
> is pretty unobjectionable, and has been updated for master.
>
>      I'd like to move this to a vote pretty swiftly, any objections ?
>
> Cheers
> Joe

Woops2,

https://gist.github.com/krakjoe/c6bcbb4e6d019c9297db

Dunno what happened there ..

Cheers
Joe