Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:71937 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 64754 invoked from network); 1 Feb 2014 19:55:11 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 1 Feb 2014 19:55:11 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=zeev@zend.com; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=zeev@zend.com; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain zend.com from 209.85.212.48 cause and error) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: zeev@zend.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.212.48 mail-vb0-f48.google.com Received: from [209.85.212.48] ([209.85.212.48:57444] helo=mail-vb0-f48.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id A8/85-30967-D115DE25 for ; Sat, 01 Feb 2014 14:55:10 -0500 Received: by mail-vb0-f48.google.com with SMTP id q16so3707002vbe.7 for ; Sat, 01 Feb 2014 11:55:06 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:references:in-reply-to:mime-version :thread-index:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=5st9Oak1OM0QalrVPVLurHt2fZU2tiagSAE03ZxUKyU=; b=buSiBjuBq94MV3ZEX6T3fbtG/FivLPI2g0zrSU0KKmEV6mI+tMifV4LMppSGmekc5v +QOEnHfUdwMbcTeIm3RU2e9pVekUhgTt/Z+VZlqAsHh3DWnNVbeSG14rk40WLuEwuqdc 0JG1sVAAPdgPuWTF1OGRVHDpa4SMUwtMvlPgW7jUXUE8UAsgnQRFhyNRIwu7SQFcAoua +XZwlUgwcD/dvTGkQDLQzqy2q2SRKhTukMpxuj1jCr5yG/yFheexoDL4EiWMcKrNQ6CJ KRofNe9HZHr5ZAo9RkB6ACK9jZpDqOx8BjBJIYGSQAf2C2GQXuNsrxCVxifuGcB23XkO 5Aqw== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQm1xuJm1qY9EuodVXkWhVQVss33OOMDz0GH+VZDjqCrdE17iCVRb+7aDbRi6MPhn8S8GsMOuaFPuJ01HO/mJX5YEqW0QI6Um8KXcankr4HCKy4dcFg3tuOgOWRwNdPjBi38QiAd X-Received: by 10.52.117.115 with SMTP id kd19mr18111962vdb.15.1391284505951; Sat, 01 Feb 2014 11:55:05 -0800 (PST) References: <52EAF0A3.2000001@oracle.com> <1d5850561e0ef9e7739c7e7b7b0448d0.squirrel@webmail.klapt.com> <52EC0B34.8080109@oracle.com> <1391279853.2941.307.camel@guybrush> In-Reply-To: <1391279853.2941.307.camel@guybrush> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0 thread-index: AQKXG/MFvR0atL/ck2TgW5/Clbz6gwLWR1gIAg2N+tQCOzxAJwKo8pBJAaeTswGYtVn/4A== Date: Sat, 1 Feb 2014 21:55:04 +0200 Message-ID: To: =?UTF-8?Q?Johannes_Schl=C3=BCter?= Cc: Christopher Jones , Anatol Belski , PHP Developers Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: RE: [PHP-DEV] [VOTE] 64 bit platform improvements for string length and integer From: zeev@zend.com (Zeev Suraski) > -----Original Message----- > From: Johannes Schl=C3=BCter [mailto:johannes@schlueters.de] > Sent: Saturday, February 01, 2014 8:38 PM > To: Zeev Suraski > Cc: Christopher Jones; Anatol Belski; PHP Developers Mailing List > Subject: RE: [PHP-DEV] [VOTE] 64 bit platform improvements for string > length and integer > > On Sat, 2014-02-01 at 20:28 +0200, Zeev Suraski wrote: > > > I agree that the 64-bit RFC doesn't affect syntax. However it does > > > materially affect the language, so I believe it requires a 2/3 > > > majority. > > > > I'd consider it a language-changing RFC. The 2/3 majority is related > > to material changes in the language, and as you said, syntax changes > > are just one (although the most common) such example. The 50%+1 is > > really for extension-level changes - mostly new functions/extensions, > > moving stuff to/from PECL, etc. > > Maybe a good difference might be > > * Patches touching main/, TSRM/ or Zend/ require 2/3rd > * Patches touching only individually SAPIs or exts require 50% Probably a clean good way to differentiate, sounds good to me. Zeev