Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:71936
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: softfail (pb1.pair.com: domain golemon.com does not designate 209.85.192.172 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: php@golemon.com
In-Reply-To: <CF.64.30967.E7E4DE25@pb1.pair.com>
References: <98.E0.35265.E17FBE25@pb1.pair.com>
	<CAESVnVrRQO=fQyLBKjomn00DK3fivFYT6qBQOGb1yxdQmBur=w@mail.gmail.com>
	<CF.64.30967.E7E4DE25@pb1.pair.com>
Date: Sat, 1 Feb 2014 11:53:41 -0800
Message-ID: <CAESVnVp0EaUvADdEqYG5FjQmn-Qifjycm0LaeG0L_YJBLa-fMQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Gordon Oheim <gooh@php.net>
Cc: PHP internals <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [VOTE] Automatic Property Initialization
From: pollita@php.net (Sara Golemon)

On Sat, Feb 1, 2014 at 11:43 AM, Gordon Oheim <gooh@php.net> wrote:
> On 01.02.2014 20:25, Sara Golemon wrote:
>> FYI, I'm voting "No" as I don't think
>> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/constructor-promotion was considered
>> adequately.  They both seek to accomplish the same goal, but one
>> introduces conflicting syntax while the other does not.
>>
>> If we're to go with the conflicting syntax, I'd like to see a
>> reasonable argument why.
>>
> How is it conflicting?
>
Because it's different from already existing syntax (Code exists in
the wild using HHVM's version of the syntax -
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/constructor-promotion ).  I'm not sure which
part you're confused about.

-Sara