Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:71928 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 49634 invoked from network); 1 Feb 2014 18:35:33 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 1 Feb 2014 18:35:33 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=pierre.php@gmail.com; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=pierre.php@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.217.173 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: pierre.php@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.217.173 mail-lb0-f173.google.com Received: from [209.85.217.173] ([209.85.217.173:40151] helo=mail-lb0-f173.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id BA/52-30967-37E3DE25 for ; Sat, 01 Feb 2014 13:35:32 -0500 Received: by mail-lb0-f173.google.com with SMTP id y6so4318418lbh.18 for ; Sat, 01 Feb 2014 10:35:28 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=3Rzbz07fsiqpgkiAkVv+C051S5g69H4zEp22CFMSajQ=; b=QW8+EwOpD8VYLDTaIxXHb7RGp6C5hf8xp7zxEIzc+mAowchDUErpWH7g/KYgMEjHLM lTDIuDoGIXyxlHISw5OJgV0LRnzcWjbr86tbb+bkviZkPwAX8HG3J+49debsbFFdxDwt WNzl/+qzs8oLZAkMOEwKu/k0VkDShdys6lvFjprmmtxdtUJFUDercSnj7luJSX30G2c0 mKU4Al2t430itOk8ddWIg1g3HFaeI0stGooPLlvF+FIuqwuO0pIuNzmLgSOZTyNyu+YK vD3wyvwHtQQ+VLTaPiXwlFxIU2j0wxYXpUhnLAExiw6exCKpNSM4KYpgqix19l8V3Jvu tYTw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.112.173.6 with SMTP id bg6mr6514348lbc.17.1391279728564; Sat, 01 Feb 2014 10:35:28 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.112.35.163 with HTTP; Sat, 1 Feb 2014 10:35:28 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <52EAF0A3.2000001@oracle.com> <1d5850561e0ef9e7739c7e7b7b0448d0.squirrel@webmail.klapt.com> <52EC0B34.8080109@oracle.com> Date: Sat, 1 Feb 2014 19:35:28 +0100 Message-ID: To: Zeev Suraski Cc: Christopher Jones , Anatol Belski , PHP Developers Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [VOTE] 64 bit platform improvements for string length and integer From: pierre.php@gmail.com (Pierre Joye) On Sat, Feb 1, 2014 at 7:28 PM, Zeev Suraski wrote: >> I agree that the 64-bit RFC doesn't affect syntax. However it does >> materially >> affect the language, so I believe it requires a 2/3 majority. > > I'd consider it a language-changing RFC. The 2/3 majority is related to > material changes in the language, and as you said, syntax changes are just > one (although the most common) such example. The 50%+1 is really for > extension-level changes - mostly new functions/extensions, moving stuff > to/from PECL, etc. It is not, there is no change from user level but on windows and a 1-2 other platforms with long being 32 bit in 64bit. Also I find amazingly disturbing the amount of efforts you are putting to shut down this RFC, without a single comment in the last months or weeks, not even now to explain your vote. I do not mind a no, but what is happening here is disgusting, to say it nicely. Cheers, -- Pierre @pierrejoye | http://www.libgd.org