Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:71924
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.216.42 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <52ECF62A.5060401@lsces.co.uk>
References: <e0681b3331094323d383a048471790f8.squirrel@webmail.klapt.com>
	<1391171792.2941.130.camel@guybrush>
	<52EB9A16.5060605@phpdoc.de>
	<1391172906.2941.140.camel@guybrush>
	<9810c708a9fcc543a263365b5d7c2a63@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAEKnhAG+4F2xoGZBkN5fBCa4mDE+3c-CMOUA_LBmtXboLvmg6g@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAEZPtU6y-ruNSozJkm7xB-iMMcNZJTrmG4QmZ+eHcsnE2ypO7g@mail.gmail.com>
	<52ECF62A.5060401@lsces.co.uk>
Date: Sat, 1 Feb 2014 14:37:44 +0100
Message-ID: <CAH-PCH5bCAC8ehgL=xBogv1sE=Z2Z7_RsGfPORX56bMrASvjgQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Lester Caine <lester@lsces.co.uk>
Cc: PHP Internals <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c2bf4e3dc3e604f1586544
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [VOTE] 64 bit platform improvements for string length
 and integer
From: tyra3l@gmail.com (Ferenc Kovacs)

--001a11c2bf4e3dc3e604f1586544
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sat, Feb 1, 2014 at 2:27 PM, Lester Caine <lester@lsces.co.uk> wrote:

> Pierre Joye wrote:
>
>> Also see Anatol latest post to internals, the sample extension shows
>> the difference between a  5.3/4/5 code and one supporting 5.3/4/5 and
>> with the int64 patch with the option #2 and #3. The changes are really
>> straightforward and far less intrusive than without these options.
>>
>
> I see that the vote currently has swung from yes to no for including in
> 5.6 but actually there is no option to include it even in PHP6? The
> improvement is required, needs proper planning because of the impact on
> many third parties, and should be planned now on the basis of a new PHP6.
>
>
Nobody said that if rejected this can't be considered for PHP6.
On the contrary, many of the no voters explained that they would have voted
yes if the target version would have been 6.0.

--=20
Ferenc Kov=C3=A1cs
@Tyr43l - http://tyrael.hu

--001a11c2bf4e3dc3e604f1586544--