Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:71913 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 95271 invoked from network); 1 Feb 2014 01:40:40 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 1 Feb 2014 01:40:40 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=yohgaki@gmail.com; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=yohgaki@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.217.173 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: yohgaki@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.217.173 mail-lb0-f173.google.com Received: from [209.85.217.173] ([209.85.217.173:61700] helo=mail-lb0-f173.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id E6/08-54292-6905CE25 for ; Fri, 31 Jan 2014 20:40:39 -0500 Received: by mail-lb0-f173.google.com with SMTP id y6so3949665lbh.4 for ; Fri, 31 Jan 2014 17:40:36 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=p7YoINPQ7yoCdf4rpNpHYcNRMszAdAUOFWJUyST4MbA=; b=doE42xnjoUfNEAC85/auBx0Qe9MlamOJ1siY1K/3U3sm+lu54WlP/sxO46toK3TkoS Y88sxFfkh9n2EPX3kcloIDgCXUXkurbuC9tGBLY6aUiSqaArRpWOlpgFN3nr31FbVGRl 7QYQQf52v6cZ/bGmKp92o3TXdW0Uy5W1TfiW4/V5SL/QqCrSZBQPbNNdqQUum6cR8KWE 9XV3f4b2hEfCRdSBECWonwm5jWjZaKM55vMGj8i5IRhtjJr6qFrj58YIQ065y1NKISLN pvGA5YVIiL/CrAK3SNY35QGeog6LidUu543200LXGyKcvTprM1O7iLUXl+26YOTviHU4 Cdog== X-Received: by 10.152.219.97 with SMTP id pn1mr14721203lac.9.1391218836175; Fri, 31 Jan 2014 17:40:36 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: yohgaki@gmail.com Received: by 10.112.199.37 with HTTP; Fri, 31 Jan 2014 17:39:56 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <18069656.FoN8fZuO6C@rofl> <8644110.XYpFnEDCiN@rofl> Date: Sat, 1 Feb 2014 10:39:56 +0900 X-Google-Sender-Auth: RNTJKw6rARretJ6lkLz3x-trfy8 Message-ID: To: Patrick Schaaf Cc: internals Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1137f67c89001e04f14e60f3 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [VOTE] Introduce session.lock, session.lazy_write and session.lazy_destory From: yohgaki@ohgaki.net (Yasuo Ohgaki) --001a1137f67c89001e04f14e60f3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Hi all, On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 6:31 PM, Yasuo Ohgaki wrote: > On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 3:31 PM, Patrick Schaaf wrote: > >> If you insist on it being short/shorter, I'd go for >> >> unlocked_unsafe >> >> or >> >> unlocked >> >> because I think, and keep thinking, that having "unlocked" there best >> defuses the traditional expectation that sessions are locked during the >> whole script run - thus minimizing the surprise to programmers at the PHP >> level. >> > Thank you for suggestions! > I would like to use > > unlock > How about 'unsafe_lock'? It may be better. Regards, -- Yasuo Ohgaki yohgaki@ohgaki.net --001a1137f67c89001e04f14e60f3--