Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:71873
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.217.174 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <52EBA069.10608@phpdoc.de>
References: <e0681b3331094323d383a048471790f8.squirrel@webmail.klapt.com>
	<1391171792.2941.130.camel@guybrush>
	<52EB9A16.5060605@phpdoc.de>
	<1391172906.2941.140.camel@guybrush>
	<52EBA069.10608@phpdoc.de>
Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2014 14:11:48 +0100
Message-ID: <CAEZPtU6BK1mUq7UHqUamox183345XKJyiWcJ1+cuBWZJsuFkzQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Ulf Wendel <ulf.wendel@phpdoc.de>
Cc: PHP internals <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [VOTE] 64 bit platform improvements for string length
 and integer
From: pierre.php@gmail.com (Pierre Joye)

On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 2:08 PM, Ulf Wendel <ulf.wendel@phpdoc.de> wrote:
> Am 31.01.2014 13:55, schrieb Johannes Schl=C3=BCter:
>> On Fri, 2014-01-31 at 13:41 +0100, Ulf Wendel wrote:
>>> Am 31.01.2014 13:36, schrieb Johannes Schl=C3=BCter:
>>>> I think adding this patch to 5.x therefore would be quite some bending
>>>> of that rule and that combined with the fact that it is late makes me
>>>> believe that proposing this for 5.6 is illegal.
>>>
>>> Are you saying the RFC is 'illegal' ? If the subject proposed is not
>>> allowed, it would make litte sense collecting votes.
>>
>> I think the RM has to reject this from 5.6 independently from the voting
>> result as he is bound by the release process RFC.
>
> Thanks for explaining. The three takeaway point for me are:
>
>  - you are serious about following the rules

Seriously. which rule define this RFC or any other RFC breaking ABI as
not allowed? There is none. And this discussions takes a ridiculous
course, can we be serious now please? :)

>  - a radical minded person may refuse to vote in the first place

I would say extremist, but yes ;)


--=20
Pierre

@pierrejoye | http://www.libgd.org