Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:71774 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 38355 invoked from network); 30 Jan 2014 05:53:39 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 30 Jan 2014 05:53:39 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=yohgaki@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=yohgaki@gmail.com; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.217.175 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: yohgaki@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.217.175 mail-lb0-f175.google.com Received: from [209.85.217.175] ([209.85.217.175:52429] helo=mail-lb0-f175.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 5E/5E-52228-1E8E9E25 for ; Thu, 30 Jan 2014 00:53:38 -0500 Received: by mail-lb0-f175.google.com with SMTP id p9so2175465lbv.34 for ; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 21:53:34 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=XKZ51a1EIDR1dvNzPD07f6nFQQxgpmwFlr92qTXcgVM=; b=bxqJSBD+Dfaq0euVub0H5+edgHaYlAVvmf/RdiJoVg/i9hdUH9IRWR0MswIOG/TE7c Em7wydk9Mv+9S/nCggWaXRDRIUrntmNGp1DT2VZwP8N717mbAf0bW0rgoR+S1wSb85/E K4rkwfIn/ciwjaONuRkWALdVSPhSyF5DAttaL0xjVtlsSbGsH62e5z8VRFFptAKVmM+p klg0OHXF94IBsZ7TX1QQIxF7V+P5S3PsJ0NOaelF1bFbN36TsoB6VfA57Lo7VNWIIT3M +sJ9Y75xjI+MWTwF9QRaMrQDCRZnJ6tiRxLbfcSc2m3RoIX9Ow1t6sCTH54nBjb66wm7 475g== X-Received: by 10.152.164.166 with SMTP id yr6mr8320049lab.1.1391061214359; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 21:53:34 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: yohgaki@gmail.com Received: by 10.112.199.37 with HTTP; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 21:52:54 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <8644110.XYpFnEDCiN@rofl> References: <18069656.FoN8fZuO6C@rofl> <8644110.XYpFnEDCiN@rofl> Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2014 14:52:54 +0900 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 8LHGwcpOQRg0O0G34w42srOQF0w Message-ID: To: Patrick Schaaf Cc: "internals@lists.php.net" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11349a028af42404f129adea Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [VOTE] Introduce session.lock, session.lazy_write and session.lazy_destory From: yohgaki@ohgaki.net (Yasuo Ohgaki) --001a11349a028af42404f129adea Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Hi Patrick, On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 2:44 PM, Patrick Schaaf wrote: > On Thursday 30 January 2014 14:34:35 Yasuo Ohgaki wrote: > > > > > Generally a really dangerous feature. minimize_lock sounds so friendly, > > > does > > > not imply danger really. > > > > > > Alternative naming proposal: unlocked_thus_unsafe > > > > It sounds good idea. How about shorter name? > > > > unsafe_lock > > Well, from the user (PHP code) level it is not a lock at all. The localized > flocking is purely for internal consistency of the individual read or write > operation, in that case. > > That's why I wanted to have 'unlocked' in the name. And for such a > dangerous > option (*) I think that a very expressive long name would be a good fit. I understand the reason. It's descriptive, but 3 words might be too long. 'transaction_lock' might be good enough for users who know DBMS, but it may not be enough for others. Does anyone have short and good name? Regards, -- Yasuo Ohgaki yohgaki@ohgaki.net --001a11349a028af42404f129adea--