Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:71765
Return-Path: <yohgaki@gmail.com>
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 13340 invoked from network); 30 Jan 2014 00:30:36 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1)
  by localhost with SMTP; 30 Jan 2014 00:30:36 -0000
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=yohgaki@gmail.com; sender-id=pass
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=yohgaki@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.217.173 as permitted sender)
X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: yohgaki@gmail.com
X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.217.173 mail-lb0-f173.google.com  
Received: from [209.85.217.173] ([209.85.217.173:44206] helo=mail-lb0-f173.google.com)
	by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP
	id EB/BA-52228-A2D99E25 for <internals@lists.php.net>; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 19:30:35 -0500
Received: by mail-lb0-f173.google.com with SMTP id y6so2019849lbh.18
        for <internals@lists.php.net>; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 16:30:30 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id
         :subject:to:cc:content-type;
        bh=qGXdA8k8OA7RbA6Fx/vY7EZliaB+E0y25xAUmW8t5jg=;
        b=U3RnENG0rc8EZJ1Lm9dmZV3HUgGPaTMMM48ALVI0rl0oET7yMFq9RF3Ic4IhYT1nSj
         GAsHO3o4dgkW9PjDH8Up4YtIGKkRli+eKGrsdx7oAPypXicgZ0npgb24y2zMCzeRD+M8
         cb0mrVDVA/V/5qnsDKKgECORnP5oDYzxd9ecjak1E4o4w2KlL3lQhRGikHGzfLpiG9L3
         DAXwRy4kWjk5HWsL9L0FbKrk5m74UlduYDWk2vRMNAdXng0Cm5TcF5tanHqqJAlGdGut
         vL9iXaRmthN2S+qC+ckBj+67qpD6AFsHUSlvoYgReenqWx6ILSYYsTQvazbrD6VLZVSN
         J6DA==
X-Received: by 10.112.173.6 with SMTP id bg6mr7000765lbc.17.1391041830504;
 Wed, 29 Jan 2014 16:30:30 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: yohgaki@gmail.com
Received: by 10.112.199.37 with HTTP; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 16:29:50 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAGa2bXZEXx7H+atr3LK8OLLQGSd9a-6+Gey+RhPwP0d7EvTBmw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAGa2bXZEXx7H+atr3LK8OLLQGSd9a-6+Gey+RhPwP0d7EvTBmw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2014 09:29:50 +0900
X-Google-Sender-Auth: 3fONOANXycxnhnNK8wd6XYPr1uU
Message-ID: <CAGa2bXZTMDQffTNF5G_N9s9qqzkD0188+jAZ5JAqoraxbKwjHQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: "internals@lists.php.net" <internals@lists.php.net>
Cc: Stas Malyshev <smalyshev@sugarcrm.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c239be2ccda004f1252a37
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Introduce session.lock, session.lazy_write and session.lazy_destory
From: yohgaki@ohgaki.net (Yasuo Ohgaki)

--001a11c239be2ccda004f1252a37
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

Hi all,

https://wiki.php.net/rfc/session-lock-ini

Before I re-open vote of this RFC, I would like to add 'read_only'
parameter for
just reading session and close immediately. This was suggested by Bill
Salak. This option is useful and the fastest way to read session.
I updated the RFC.

There are 6 vote options now. It would be too much.
Does anyone mind if I make the RFC a single vote?
Or should I separate Proposal 2 (minimize_lock)?

Regards,

--
Yasuo Ohgaki
yohgaki@ohgaki.net

--001a11c239be2ccda004f1252a37--