Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:71729 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 37383 invoked from network); 29 Jan 2014 15:13:54 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 29 Jan 2014 15:13:54 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=lester@lsces.co.uk; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=lester@lsces.co.uk; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain lsces.co.uk from 217.147.176.204 cause and error) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: lester@lsces.co.uk X-Host-Fingerprint: 217.147.176.204 mail4.serversure.net Linux 2.6 Received: from [217.147.176.204] ([217.147.176.204:44015] helo=mail4.serversure.net) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id AE/71-26556-FAA19E25 for ; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 10:13:52 -0500 Received: (qmail 16672 invoked by uid 89); 29 Jan 2014 15:13:48 -0000 Received: by simscan 1.3.1 ppid: 16665, pid: 16668, t: 0.0498s scanners: attach: 1.3.1 clamav: 0.96/m:52 Received: from unknown (HELO linux-dev4.lsces.org.uk) (lester@rainbowdigitalmedia.org.uk@81.138.11.136) by mail4.serversure.net with ESMTPA; 29 Jan 2014 15:13:48 -0000 Message-ID: <52E91B3A.6080009@lsces.co.uk> Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 15:16:10 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:26.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/26.0 SeaMonkey/2.23 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: internals@lists.php.net References: <7E.A3.39789.25841E25@pb1.pair.com> <12.A5.39789.B7851E25@pb1.pair.com> <52E16E01.7070401@gmail.com> <52E1BDB0.6050406@garfieldtech.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP6] Function name consistency From: lester@lsces.co.uk (Lester Caine) Levi Morrison wrote: >> If we're going to do anything, be aggressive and far-reaching with it. >> >Build a proper language-level OOP design for string/array manipulation. >> > > This is a completely honest, sincere question: Why should the language > itself use an object-oriented design for everything it provides? Well personally I'll continue to use the current functions. It was more a suggestion to free up the pressure on changing them at all. Let the people who object to the format have an alternative the rest of us can ignore ;) -- Lester Caine - G8HFL ----------------------------- Contact - http://lsces.co.uk/wiki/?page=contact L.S.Caine Electronic Services - http://lsces.co.uk EnquirySolve - http://enquirysolve.com/ Model Engineers Digital Workshop - http://medw.co.uk Rainbow Digital Media - http://rainbowdigitalmedia.co.uk