Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:71689 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 30698 invoked from network); 28 Jan 2014 17:57:56 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 28 Jan 2014 17:57:56 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=lester@lsces.co.uk; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=lester@lsces.co.uk; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain lsces.co.uk from 217.147.176.204 cause and error) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: lester@lsces.co.uk X-Host-Fingerprint: 217.147.176.204 mail4.serversure.net Linux 2.6 Received: from [217.147.176.204] ([217.147.176.204:36551] helo=mail4.serversure.net) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 15/C5-01140-2AFE7E25 for ; Tue, 28 Jan 2014 12:57:55 -0500 Received: (qmail 29825 invoked by uid 89); 28 Jan 2014 17:57:51 -0000 Received: by simscan 1.3.1 ppid: 29819, pid: 29822, t: 0.0562s scanners: attach: 1.3.1 clamav: 0.96/m:52 Received: from unknown (HELO linux-dev4.lsces.org.uk) (lester@rainbowdigitalmedia.org.uk@81.138.11.136) by mail4.serversure.net with ESMTPA; 28 Jan 2014 17:57:51 -0000 Message-ID: <52E7F029.5040606@lsces.co.uk> Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 18:00:09 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:26.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/26.0 SeaMonkey/2.23 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: internals@lists.php.net References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] some thoughts about php 6 From: lester@lsces.co.uk (Lester Caine) Kristopher wrote: >> We are not talking about file paths here but method, function, constant >> >names. >> > > Are we taking class and namespace names as well? Not sure why we would > address method, function and constant names and not address class and > namespace names. > > And if we are addressing class names, then my point stands. When using > autoloaders, most often class and namespace names dictate path names. > > So if we are talking class names, then we are most definitely talking paths > as well. Exactly the one I'm hitting ... This automatic loading is not something I actually like at all but just something else we have to live with these days? :( -- Lester Caine - G8HFL ----------------------------- Contact - http://lsces.co.uk/wiki/?page=contact L.S.Caine Electronic Services - http://lsces.co.uk EnquirySolve - http://enquirysolve.com/ Model Engineers Digital Workshop - http://medw.co.uk Rainbow Digital Media - http://rainbowdigitalmedia.co.uk