Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:71610 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 16734 invoked from network); 26 Jan 2014 22:35:54 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 26 Jan 2014 22:35:54 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=smalyshev@sugarcrm.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=smalyshev@sugarcrm.com; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain sugarcrm.com designates 67.192.241.193 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: smalyshev@sugarcrm.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 67.192.241.193 smtp193.dfw.emailsrvr.com Linux 2.6 Received: from [67.192.241.193] ([67.192.241.193:45523] helo=smtp193.dfw.emailsrvr.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 2B/C7-12631-9CD85E25 for ; Sun, 26 Jan 2014 17:35:54 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp19.relay.dfw1a.emailsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id B7ED53C819D; Sun, 26 Jan 2014 17:35:50 -0500 (EST) X-Virus-Scanned: OK Received: by smtp19.relay.dfw1a.emailsrvr.com (Authenticated sender: smalyshev-AT-sugarcrm.com) with ESMTPSA id 6449F3C80B8; Sun, 26 Jan 2014 17:35:50 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <52E58DC5.50903@sugarcrm.com> Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2014 14:35:49 -0800 Organization: SugarCRM User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Yasuo Ohgaki CC: "internals@lists.php.net" References: <52E4A992.1050902@sugarcrm.com> <52E56CD1.2060803@sugarcrm.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [VOTE] Default character encoding From: smalyshev@sugarcrm.com (Stas Malyshev) Hi! > For the record, I committed this patch to 5.4 and up. You seem to be talking about different patch. The patch I am talking about is https://github.com/php/php-src/pull/568, it was not committed anywhere (and definitely not in 5.4 as it is targeted to be in 5.6) and Travis shows segfaults on it (see https://travis-ci.org/php/php-src/builds/17247814) which are not it regular master Travis tests. > The segfaults of zend engine are irrelevant for this proposal. I disagree, segfaults caused by the patch are very relevant. -- Stanislav Malyshev, Software Architect SugarCRM: http://www.sugarcrm.com/ (408)454-6900 ext. 227