Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:71479 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 51681 invoked from network); 24 Jan 2014 06:15:15 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 24 Jan 2014 06:15:14 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=adam@adamharvey.name; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=adam@adamharvey.name; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain adamharvey.name designates 209.85.213.175 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: adam@adamharvey.name X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.213.175 mail-ig0-f175.google.com Received: from [209.85.213.175] ([209.85.213.175:43107] helo=mail-ig0-f175.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id C9/65-39789-2F402E25 for ; Fri, 24 Jan 2014 01:15:14 -0500 Received: by mail-ig0-f175.google.com with SMTP id uq10so1729377igb.2 for ; Thu, 23 Jan 2014 22:15:11 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=adamharvey.name; s=google; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=5aci8zSbDIwjA0e36H8Wp5JJnK7uk+gAjowX2tmYRX8=; b=db7HIcaWK/ie0aQNbszx/46M7MlQU7GNzm925JdLGl127KwmrgZj9nfJjQe3ZaLfY4 Alrc3KsNuookUIAVUuO70GZbzuVFVx0+wHGaFZydKIgL98ued73FiNt6LjSnQ6dt3xyx k8oon3r/BFdZBJVEW/ngnVurYODVL0KEmQQxI= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=5aci8zSbDIwjA0e36H8Wp5JJnK7uk+gAjowX2tmYRX8=; b=Cb1vk+vqe/scR4L/5SgagVTt7Fa7uc4UzjnQtB+ikDoR0iTHPWGKVJy7EnKC9xcYVn YOUsJJ7pJPwOQ2PcvT8aIPhU2ilSqQvZ1r8RB4vMeUnYFLdqJE5Aip8qwA7KYYOlYXPm vPpyq6bGNqm5mY0qjYRmLRF8qv5/zPYRg6VXdQOqSECYCNei3oYm7cCt2j0ovGq3gAEf yPWxpITJSueuGNzyLE7HcL4RQrSiaYY3AQcUDJqAkq+FGnAqhhJiPBmn4ue4mpgBgEO8 2XR4KFewxv9bOD1VrM0fRplp7lXiK5DFybok7iPKbs8+sNbG9NiwXa2A49NKRubwBkA1 oeqA== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlSI/bup6gtOt0CRrcXath+fe+Kb1CFkI6Lr5okdjW9u9lxio4domML2znygi2E05gunaMR X-Received: by 10.50.50.137 with SMTP id c9mr2964715igo.42.1390544111415; Thu, 23 Jan 2014 22:15:11 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: adam@adamharvey.name Received: by 10.42.206.208 with HTTP; Thu, 23 Jan 2014 22:14:51 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2014 14:14:51 +0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 8lM0WXkSr14g5hJ888DosFVNoJw Message-ID: To: Philip Sturgeon Cc: "internals@lists.php.net" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV][VOTE] "Array Of" v Generics From: aharvey@php.net (Adam Harvey) On 24 January 2014 11:20, Philip Sturgeon wrote: > Can you lot vote A, B, C or D to show your interest? > > A) I want Array Of, but not Generics > B) I want Generics, but not Array Of > C) I want both > D) I want neither I would vote B, I guess. I want generics and array of, but see array of as a subset of generic functionality, personally. For 5.6, though, I'd vote D. We have plenty of good stuff in 5.6 already, and I think we're at the point now where I'd rather see what's in there get stabilised than spending serious effort on rushing major new features in before the cut off. Additionally, I think this would be an particularly good candidate for a new major version. (More on that later.) Adam