Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:71453 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 75515 invoked from network); 23 Jan 2014 18:43:34 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 23 Jan 2014 18:43:34 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=hannes.magnusson@gmail.com; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=hannes.magnusson@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.160.45 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: hannes.magnusson@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.160.45 mail-pb0-f45.google.com Received: from [209.85.160.45] ([209.85.160.45:56057] helo=mail-pb0-f45.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 78/F6-39789-5D261E25 for ; Thu, 23 Jan 2014 13:43:33 -0500 Received: by mail-pb0-f45.google.com with SMTP id un15so2191390pbc.32 for ; Thu, 23 Jan 2014 10:43:30 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=gzgBJkha4QeSeN0+zpjc/In/aC3B/ESW5YWsPRWslXE=; b=pBkS6qNM6P/6IYff9XYqBCpSsY8ICWKcgviCqPKvC4uEY3Ywa23sWDXR0IDJvX4/wt n4EXN27EusX38pajjHH1YBQECBnPBbB306MO8MzRRYR2mg2BvD0266oJQHsj9oR0WUVG LAsXs5DexW7UC2Exjwe2l82EQfXHNfXscxBOcN/pIyTRhQdNXTsxmYy7mIMZD0+NVRoy 12dPd6bPc/nz+qOIYfx2X/vCX9tOpJvfdUBC2XZJNTCITI/A/p4uxN0UcMcrkO5MqurT 9Agqk8e5Ieu1CkvFMp24AnmlNpFp1M18AJZS6Bk066RAAM9ZENDRoVKwZHrR3JcnA+C1 78xw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.68.12.138 with SMTP id y10mr9647529pbb.101.1390502610566; Thu, 23 Jan 2014 10:43:30 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.68.60.3 with HTTP; Thu, 23 Jan 2014 10:43:30 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2014 10:43:30 -0800 Message-ID: To: Anatol Belski Cc: PHP internals Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] 64 bit improvements, open questions From: hannes.magnusson@gmail.com (Hannes Magnusson) On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 12:20 AM, Anatol Belski wrote: > Also one big question from the RFC which haven't been addressed is the > handling of the stale SAPIs. While porting it turned out, that more than > 50% of SAPIs reference no more actively supported web servers, some of That sounds like should be a separate RFC "killing old sapis" since thats a different subject completely, even though that decision has consequences for this rfc. -Hannes