Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:71395 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 87524 invoked from network); 22 Jan 2014 05:49:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 22 Jan 2014 05:49:48 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=swhitemanlistens-software@cypressintegrated.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=swhitemanlistens-software@cypressintegrated.com; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain cypressintegrated.com designates 173.1.104.101 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: swhitemanlistens-software@cypressintegrated.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 173.1.104.101 rproxy2-b-iv.figureone.com Received: from [173.1.104.101] ([173.1.104.101:56977] helo=rproxy2-b-iv.figureone.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id DF/60-17975-BFB5FD25 for ; Wed, 22 Jan 2014 00:49:47 -0500 Received: from bad.dop.co ([108.12.130.219]) by rproxy2-b-iv.figureone.com (Brand New Heavy v1.0) with ASMTP id IGT14839 for ; Tue, 21 Jan 2014 21:49:39 -0800 Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2014 00:49:42 -0500 Reply-To: Sanford Whiteman X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <5310198427.20140122004942@cypressintegrated.com> To: Yasuo Ohgaki In-Reply-To: References: <52DDBAE5.2010803@ajf.me> <578491939.20140121161232@cypressintegrated.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [VOTE] [RFC] Alphanumeric Decrement From: swhitemanlistens-software@cypressintegrated.com (Sanford Whiteman) > Everything it may seem inconsistent/strange is in the page, even if > it is documented/ not a bug/fixed already. =20 Guess it's sensible to have a clearinghouse where quirky forward-reverse differences, real bugs, and frequently misunderstood features are combined, but I think the features should be labeled as such. You have things like // this is the problem =20 // what should happen =20 where there's no "problem" at all, and "should" doesn't have any bibliography to back it up. > I remember we were discussing this way, way back and I noted that > loose comparison in SQL has the same output (as always, I'm not saying > PHP "is" SQL -- it just seems =C2=ABde rigueur=C2=BB to bring other lang= uages > into the discussion these days). > If you recall, please add to the RFC or let me know. OK, I'm working on getting a new Wiki password but no worky at the moment.... -- S.