Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:71303 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 15373 invoked from network); 20 Jan 2014 07:54:06 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 20 Jan 2014 07:54:06 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=smalyshev@sugarcrm.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=smalyshev@sugarcrm.com; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain sugarcrm.com designates 108.166.43.99 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: smalyshev@sugarcrm.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 108.166.43.99 smtp99.ord1c.emailsrvr.com Linux 2.6 Received: from [108.166.43.99] ([108.166.43.99:45195] helo=smtp99.ord1c.emailsrvr.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 50/A2-02192-D16DCD25 for ; Mon, 20 Jan 2014 02:54:05 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp5.relay.ord1c.emailsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 36C551B0318; Mon, 20 Jan 2014 02:54:02 -0500 (EST) X-Virus-Scanned: OK Received: by smtp5.relay.ord1c.emailsrvr.com (Authenticated sender: smalyshev-AT-sugarcrm.com) with ESMTPSA id C70C21B03B4; Mon, 20 Jan 2014 02:54:01 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <52DCD619.9000700@sugarcrm.com> Date: Sun, 19 Jan 2014 23:54:01 -0800 Organization: SugarCRM User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Pierre Joye , Julien Pauli CC: PHP internals References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] 5.5 to 5.6 cleanup From: smalyshev@sugarcrm.com (Stas Malyshev) Hi! >> - ext/intl stuff > > Intl? Are you sure? There's a function that we deprecated in 5.5, namely setTimeZoneID. It was replaced by much better one, setTimeZone. But technically there's no strict necessity really to remove it, except that new code is supposed to always use new function. -- Stanislav Malyshev, Software Architect SugarCRM: http://www.sugarcrm.com/ (408)454-6900 ext. 227