Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:71290 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 88279 invoked from network); 20 Jan 2014 02:56:36 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 20 Jan 2014 02:56:36 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=smalyshev@sugarcrm.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=smalyshev@sugarcrm.com; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain sugarcrm.com designates 108.166.43.115 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: smalyshev@sugarcrm.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 108.166.43.115 smtp115.ord1c.emailsrvr.com Linux 2.6 Received: from [108.166.43.115] ([108.166.43.115:58395] helo=smtp115.ord1c.emailsrvr.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id F1/10-21343-3609CD25 for ; Sun, 19 Jan 2014 21:56:35 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp7.relay.ord1c.emailsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 4DA341B846B; Sun, 19 Jan 2014 21:56:32 -0500 (EST) X-Virus-Scanned: OK Received: by smtp7.relay.ord1c.emailsrvr.com (Authenticated sender: smalyshev-AT-sugarcrm.com) with ESMTPSA id E85031B847A; Sun, 19 Jan 2014 21:56:31 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <52DC905F.2080705@sugarcrm.com> Date: Sun, 19 Jan 2014 18:56:31 -0800 Organization: SugarCRM User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Yasuo Ohgaki , "internals@lists.php.net" References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [VOTE] Introduce session.lock, session.lazy_write and session.lazy_destory From: smalyshev@sugarcrm.com (Stas Malyshev) Hi! > Vote period: 2014/01/20 - 2014/01/30 > https://wiki.php.net/rfc/session-lock-ini > > New comments and questions are welcomed. I see there are three proposals there, but only one vote. E.g. I think unlocked sessions are not a good idea, but lazy write may be ok (btw, interaction between no-lock and lazy write can lead to completely undebuggable scenarios when same data by same code sometimes are written and sometimes are not depending on session state). I'm not sure I even understand what lazy_destroy does - if the data is deleted then it's deleted, how can it be accessible and why? Also, do I understand correctly that the options would apply only to files module? If so, why they under session.* and not session.files.* or something to emphasize that if you're not using files module it doesn't do anything? -- Stanislav Malyshev, Software Architect SugarCRM: http://www.sugarcrm.com/ (408)454-6900 ext. 227