Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:7124 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 16126 invoked by uid 1010); 15 Jan 2004 13:05:29 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 16102 invoked from network); 15 Jan 2004 13:05:29 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO matrix.gna.ch) (195.226.6.8) by pb1.pair.com with SMTP; 15 Jan 2004 13:05:29 -0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by matrix.gna.ch (Postfix) with ESMTP id B313D380; Thu, 15 Jan 2004 14:05:28 +0100 (CET) Received: by matrix.gna.ch (Postfix, from userid 65534) id 6055F382; Thu, 15 Jan 2004 14:05:27 +0100 (CET) Received: from cschneid.com (unknown [195.226.4.61]) by matrix.gna.ch (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40B82380; Thu, 15 Jan 2004 14:05:24 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <40069013.1000004@cschneid.com> Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 14:05:23 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20031009 X-Accept-Language: de-ch, de, en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Marcus Boerger Cc: Adam Maccabee Trachtenberg , internals@lists.php.net References: <562031508046.20040114230741@marcus-boerger.de> In-Reply-To: <562031508046.20040114230741@marcus-boerger.de> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.76.7.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.61 (1.212.2.1-2003-12-09-exp) on matrix.gna.ch X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=2.61 X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS Ultramail snapshot-20020531 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] SimpleXML: Moving Forward From: cschneid@cschneid.com (Christian Schneider) Marcus Boerger wrote: > Thanks for moving backward. Since iterating is now worthless i am all for > removing it completley. I mean it isn't even in the spirit of the extension. Care to explain? I'm dazed and confused on how you came to the conclusion that iterators are now worthless... Was this discussed off-list? No message on the list seems indicating that to me but maybe I missed it. Or I don't understand what you mean by 'iterators' or 'worthless'. Wanting to understand your frustration, - Chris