Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:71138
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.217.194 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAH-PCH5bTUqPxRZCuDHKumhZu9TRONFnBMkkHLBN-b+4dk-VEg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAH-PCH7n-6YaSCE+PG01TD9z4ArxzQkUK5wJbXjK=cqmj-xkjw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CADajX4Cx3RxoVdLoao69MTDe1PXWgsLaRu_sttY8bra7sJMYyQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAH-PCH7ciKdL713vz8+wfbY40eKbxyXTeRZZs=6r2g-ScJ3abA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAMUwpuR3=30XSisLQv1wnDtDLFdXfehLtsH_g+cKSWDwi75vJg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAH-PCH5bTUqPxRZCuDHKumhZu9TRONFnBMkkHLBN-b+4dk-VEg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2014 10:36:37 -0500
Message-ID: <CABDNdAF8NOCH250y9kYUNRMSQXg+wUoj_ctAAAKLSKRzp6D5MQ@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: PHP Internals <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Proposed timetable for PHP 5.6.0
From: pjsturgeon@gmail.com (Philip Sturgeon)

I'm writing one up literally as we speak. Any chance of a hard
deadline on time to get it done by, or maybe pushing it back a day?

On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 10:33 AM, Ferenc Kovacs <tyrael@php.net> wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 1:41 PM, Julien Pauli <jpauli@php.net> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 7:56 AM, Ferenc Kovacs <tyrael@php.net> wrote:
>> >
>> > 2013.12.12. 19:48, "Adam Harvey" <aharvey@php.net> ezt =EDrta:
>> >
>> >
>> >>
>> >> On 12 December 2013 04:23, Ferenc Kovacs <tyrael@php.net> wrote:
>> >> > As you probably all remember the first beta usually means feature
>> >> > freeze,
>> >> > so no new additions are allowed, only fixes, so the code can stabil=
ize
>> >> > in
>> >> > the beta and RC phase.
>> >> > Learning from the past we would also like to introduce a new rule
>> about
>> >> > not
>> >> > accepting new RFCs targeting 5.6.0 after the first alpha is shipped=
,
>> >> > because given the discussion and voting period it can force us into=
 a
>> >> > spot
>> >> > where we have to chose between
>> >>
>> >> I like this: +1.
>> >>
>> >> If it works well, then we probably want to announce the calendar a
>> >> little earlier for the 2015 release, since there's now a pretty narro=
w
>> >> window to propose an RFC and have it voted on before January 16. By m=
y
>> >> estimation, an RFC will have to enter "in discussion" by December 26
>> >> (hope nobody has plans over the holidays) to be accepted for PHP 5.6,
>> >> assuming minimal two week discussion and one week voting periods.
>> >
>> > Nope, you can introduce RFCs until the first alpha, RFCs under
>> discussion or
>> > under voting are allowed to be added (until the first beta).
>> >
>> > Ofc. this still leaves with only a month, which also includes
>> chirstmas/new
>> > year so not that much time, but we are already a bit behind schedule.
>>
>> Yup, with Christmas and all, that will slow things down.
>> We still can accept little delays, we all are humans, but not a one mont=
h
>> delay.
>> We must release final on June
>>
>> Julien
>>
>
> Hi,
>
> I plan to tag the the first alpha today, and release it tomorrow, so the
> time for new RFCs are almost up.