Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:71067 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 1600 invoked from network); 11 Jan 2014 16:05:45 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 11 Jan 2014 16:05:45 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=ab@php.net; spf=unknown; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=ab@php.net; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: unknown (pb1.pair.com: domain php.net does not designate 85.214.73.107 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: ab@php.net X-Host-Fingerprint: 85.214.73.107 klapt.com Received: from [85.214.73.107] ([85.214.73.107:56057] helo=klapt.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 62/00-01384-5DB61D25 for ; Sat, 11 Jan 2014 11:05:44 -0500 Received: by klapt.com (Postfix, from userid 33) id B35CD23D6080; Sat, 11 Jan 2014 17:05:38 +0100 (CET) Received: from 188.110.167.245 (SquirrelMail authenticated user anatol@belski.net) by webmail.klapt.com with HTTP; Sat, 11 Jan 2014 17:05:38 +0100 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sat, 11 Jan 2014 17:05:38 +0100 To: "Pierre Joye" Cc: "PHP internals" Reply-To: "Anatol Belski" User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.5.2 [SVN] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] 64 bit platform improvements for string length and integer From: ab@php.net ("Anatol Belski") On Sat, January 11, 2014 15:43, Pierre Joye wrote: > Hi, > > > On Jan 10, 2014 3:58 PM, "Anatol Belski" wrote: > >> >> Hi, >> >> >> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/size_t_and_int64 >> >> >> The discussion time has come. The work on the feature branch continues. >> The current patch is stable enough to be discussed. >> >> > > For the record, we actually like to target 5.6 for this change. There was > a little confusion due to the 5.6 timetable having been slightly shifted. > > Also the various changes we introduce has been discussed intensively (on > this list on irc) to minimize the amount of changes required to support > 64bit integer. > > I've updated the RFC accordingly, also the possible vote choices. Regards Anatol