Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:71066
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.217.175 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <581A185E-0F00-4B49-AA87-859D75E63BA2@googlemail.com>
References: <581A185E-0F00-4B49-AA87-859D75E63BA2@googlemail.com>
Date: Sat, 11 Jan 2014 10:50:35 -0500
Message-ID: <CABDNdAEOF6TeEiWRM6WfxNk6ex7SGPheTSzxX+59ryDg+ErV6Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: PHP internals <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Revisiting the "Named Arguments" RFC
From: pjsturgeon@gmail.com (Philip Sturgeon)

I've heard that it's waiting for the EngineException RFC to go
through, as the implementation with it is much stronger than without
it.

On Sat, Jan 11, 2014 at 10:42 AM, Kevin Ingwersen
<ingwie2000@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Hello there.
>
> Within one of the recent votes, I was reminded upon an RFC for named para=
meters/arguments - to be exact, this one: https://wiki.php.net/rfc/named_pa=
rams
>
> I just wanted to know if this RFC is still in discussion, has been droppe=
d, or what else is currently being up with it. Because in my opinion, that=
=92d be a very useful addition - as many modern languages support this kind=
 of feature already. The only language that I personaly am using that suppo=
rts that is Objective-C - and in there, it is very useful. Although its qui=
te different - it=92s a different call-style entirely - I could imagine the=
 implementation from the link above to be very useful in PHP.
>
> It would be great to know the current state of the RFC, as I didn=92t rea=
lly see anything of its current state on the page itself.
>
> Kind regards,
> Ingwie