Newsgroups: php.internals,php.webmaster Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:71033 php.webmaster:18060 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 19405 invoked from network); 7 Jan 2014 00:32:36 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 7 Jan 2014 00:32:36 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=ajf@ajf.me; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=ajf@ajf.me; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain ajf.me designates 198.187.29.240 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: ajf@ajf.me X-Host-Fingerprint: 198.187.29.240 imap2-1.ox.registrar-servers.com Received: from [198.187.29.240] ([198.187.29.240:53883] helo=imap2-1.ox.registrar-servers.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 80/10-18828-22B4BC25 for ; Mon, 06 Jan 2014 19:32:35 -0500 Received: from [192.168.0.200] (unknown [90.201.41.104]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by oxmail.registrar-servers.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2A9275A0051; Mon, 6 Jan 2014 19:32:30 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <52CB4B1C.70507@ajf.me> Date: Tue, 07 Jan 2014 00:32:28 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Hannes Magnusson , Stas Malyshev CC: Peter Cowburn , Pierre Joye , Nikita Popov , PHP internals , php-webmaster References: <52CAFCE2.8060608@sugarcrm.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-WEBMASTER] Re: [PHP-DEV] RFC votes no longer visible From: ajf@ajf.me (Andrea Faulds) On 06/01/14 19:26, Hannes Magnusson wrote: > - The author of the RFC can no longer bribe and "convince" individual > person to change his/hers vote I'm unconvinced "bribery" exists. What I do know exists is that people who make RFCs will contact people who voted No to try and see how they can improve the RFC to be more to their liking. I can't see how this could be a bad thing. -- Andrea Faulds http://ajf.me/