Newsgroups: php.internals,php.webmaster
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:71027 php.webmaster:18054
Return-Path: <petercowburn@gmail.com>
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 98425 invoked from network); 6 Jan 2014 18:46:57 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1)
  by localhost with SMTP; 6 Jan 2014 18:46:57 -0000
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=petercowburn@gmail.com; sender-id=pass
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=petercowburn@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.216.53 as permitted sender)
X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: petercowburn@gmail.com
X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.216.53 mail-qa0-f53.google.com  
Received: from [209.85.216.53] ([209.85.216.53:63135] helo=mail-qa0-f53.google.com)
	by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP
	id 49/77-62543-F1AFAC25 for <internals@lists.php.net>; Mon, 06 Jan 2014 13:46:56 -0500
Received: by mail-qa0-f53.google.com with SMTP id j5so3304678qaq.5
        for <multiple recipients>; Mon, 06 Jan 2014 10:46:53 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id
         :subject:to:cc:content-type;
        bh=PZSjRmDnYU6Dz8iHq9kHLRLTkwZVdz6Grd5DcEwJ+TU=;
        b=JbIRaL3+g0HkvAtL9ah0E9//do7FDsKYpyir4vh1SzZDcx8D7uyeM9l1Rz1oojMiFv
         tOvT+6RDv74UeOTptorGmQYZUdyYGxlrF53Xd7LiUes96kk7lkGCkb6nOWcZoK5jGMsh
         tT4ax3tI5rvjww4Nj6kyXkl1uNhKASEvLgbCBkbzsoqmTO3I/EOF/q6L+fXjIHhQm2Cp
         RAkIWIdeORMtjcEwevzIDweRztz27bLJNmGakLLz3W2lq0QuV8tMqbN5VTfl0fERbeZS
         bmSW0WIc5muP1eXfunQu0ooeqIhKwO3ySw6Rz04tTIht3ql85LXa3OK8cU5FtXV/P2Wq
         o4AA==
X-Received: by 10.229.71.5 with SMTP id f5mr179197695qcj.18.1389034013675;
 Mon, 06 Jan 2014 10:46:53 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: petercowburn@gmail.com
Received: by 10.96.165.2 with HTTP; Mon, 6 Jan 2014 10:46:13 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAEZPtU7ywc2vg3Dj2Jrqq7GdEDZKOUcew-vHR6yDLnTFqnqeGw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAF+90c9VeZ8Y1UMy1aQAoDjRr5nmx6stdqESiC1uV8wAk_e=1A@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAEZPtU7ywc2vg3Dj2Jrqq7GdEDZKOUcew-vHR6yDLnTFqnqeGw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2014 18:46:13 +0000
X-Google-Sender-Auth: M5A4_vqh4CTBH5A22zkL2WTsOuY
Message-ID: <CAPg3XxJ7KcaWE3j1g5GLtAuQuVFqaMdrzOzJOnvyPZJw-_d6gw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Pierre Joye <pierre.php@gmail.com>
Cc: Nikita Popov <nikita.ppv@gmail.com>, PHP internals <internals@lists.php.net>, 
	php-webmaster <php-webmaster@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1133bfaaf7707d04ef51aef5
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] RFC votes no longer visible
From: salathe@php.net (Peter Cowburn)

--001a1133bfaaf7707d04ef51aef5
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On 6 January 2014 17:28, Pierre Joye <pierre.php@gmail.com> wrote:

> hi,
>
> On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 5:24 PM, Nikita Popov <nikita.ppv@gmail.com> wrote=
:
> > Hi folks!
> >
> > Recently a change was committed [1] that no longer displays votes on
> active
> > RFCs. I think this would have merited discussion beforehand, so I'm
> > starting that discussion now.
> >
> > I can see where this comes from (avoid herd effect?), but I don't think
> > it's a good idea. I can't even see votes on my own RFCs, so I don't kno=
w
> > how things are going and if there are still issues. Also this prevents
> the
> > "vote reason" column that was suggested in several recent discussions.
> That
> > would seem like a much more valuable change than just removing the vote=
s.
>
> it does not make any sense. And it should not have been done without a
> discussion.
>
> @peter Please revert.
>

I=92d rather see discussion on the subject than an immediate revert; not th=
at
I=92m against reverting in any way. Let=92s make the changes, if we do deci=
de
to make any, be beneficial.

The offending change was a suuuppppeeerrrr old pull request that had been
laying around forever and Hannes decided to merge it.

It had been around for such a long time that I figure any complaints would
have been raised and addressed between the initial PR [1] and now.  Funny
how people like to voice their dissent after-the-fact (just an observation,
not a prompt for discussion).

CC-ing webmaster list as a more appropriate forum.

[1] https://github.com/php/web-wiki/pull/1


> --
> Pierre
>
> @pierrejoye | http://www.libgd.org
>

--001a1133bfaaf7707d04ef51aef5--