Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:70813 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 85592 invoked from network); 21 Dec 2013 12:40:04 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 21 Dec 2013 12:40:04 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=ab@php.net; spf=unknown; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=ab@php.net; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: unknown (pb1.pair.com: domain php.net does not designate 85.214.73.107 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: ab@php.net X-Host-Fingerprint: 85.214.73.107 klapt.com Received: from [85.214.73.107] ([85.214.73.107:60102] helo=klapt.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 78/05-50487-42C85B25 for ; Sat, 21 Dec 2013 07:40:04 -0500 Received: by klapt.com (Postfix, from userid 33) id C832323D6137; Sat, 21 Dec 2013 13:40:00 +0100 (CET) Received: from 188.99.119.148 (SquirrelMail authenticated user anatol@belski.net) by webmail.klapt.com with HTTP; Sat, 21 Dec 2013 13:40:00 +0100 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <52B46DD8.9060905@ajf.me> References: <2d2b8833cdd18298c7ecf19bac3ef3ea.squirrel@webmail.klapt.com> <3cf29b10143104230749852cd10a735f.squirrel@webmail.klapt.com> <52B46DD8.9060905@ajf.me> Date: Sat, 21 Dec 2013 13:40:00 +0100 To: "Andrea Faulds" Cc: "Martin Keckeis" , internals@lists.php.net Reply-To: "Anatol Belski" User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.5.2 [SVN] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] 64 bit platform improvements From: ab@php.net ("Anatol Belski") Hi Andrea, On Fri, December 20, 2013 17:18, Andrea Faulds wrote: >> >>> I'm having two open questions: >>> - is this the continued work where Anthony started? Or completely >>> restarted? >> That's the branch initiated by Anthony where we've worked on size_t >> changes only first. int64 came later and is now integrated with all >> together. >> > > Where's Martin's email? I can't see it. Did he mistakenly reply to you > instead of doing Reply All or Reply To List? > true assumption :) However I thought it's worth while to post my answer to the lists. Regards anatol