Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:70631
Return-Path: <ingwie2000@googlemail.com>
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 72743 invoked from network); 14 Dec 2013 00:34:51 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1)
  by localhost with SMTP; 14 Dec 2013 00:34:51 -0000
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=ingwie2000@googlemail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=ingwie2000@googlemail.com; sender-id=pass
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain googlemail.com designates 74.125.83.51 as permitted sender)
X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: ingwie2000@googlemail.com
X-Host-Fingerprint: 74.125.83.51 mail-ee0-f51.google.com  
Received: from [74.125.83.51] ([74.125.83.51:38839] helo=mail-ee0-f51.google.com)
	by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP
	id 72/21-00859-9A7ABA25 for <internals@lists.php.net>; Fri, 13 Dec 2013 19:34:50 -0500
Received: by mail-ee0-f51.google.com with SMTP id b15so1163235eek.24
        for <internals@lists.php.net>; Fri, 13 Dec 2013 16:34:47 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=googlemail.com; s=20120113;
        h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc
         :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to;
        bh=5h0B/0XVNMG/u6lTa++lmDiiT7FLNCfQHyfxzGVPpA4=;
        b=QkuwPxYcrX1TNdLuNwFCPU0fVX+4y89ofP2Z3+6YC3mH6LMHnWcT5fvzs/ZTD/N3O2
         DWc4o8ITAcNb+vsa13XwuMTfXCGZbqKv6u/QP+/WXA2ZouVj+pCQLlfwA7Z6z0WZr69I
         VvTN4Ob5NNLB2a1Vo6IsHckwOyPtfYdTo1XsLmktUNWU9mf1exsMczD+x4EjoVmbDax0
         GmdI4Hp5FDUCTImwOK05rC/tuMh9Dq2w+ULUIPG+O+aV4RAftgjOkLnfz0OfrGcuV3G6
         A7lPUK64UqnFWyjj1San1PAeFXGYtkRt8GyouETLFDzX/m3NABOjkXlf80WskIpjcKdj
         6GSQ==
X-Received: by 10.15.111.201 with SMTP id cj49mr5385270eeb.56.1386981286941;
        Fri, 13 Dec 2013 16:34:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ingwies-air.fritz.box (p5B15D42E.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [91.21.212.46])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id a51sm12499792eeh.8.2013.12.13.16.34.46
        for <multiple recipients>
        (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
        Fri, 13 Dec 2013 16:34:46 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.0 \(1822\))
In-Reply-To: <52ABA642.9090206@php.net>
Date: Sat, 14 Dec 2013 01:34:45 +0100
Cc: php-dev <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-ID: <0CAE0CF1-7059-4B97-81AC-BFB39614F5AB@googlemail.com>
References: <52ABA642.9090206@php.net>
To: Stefan Neufeind <neufeind@php.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1822)
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Proposal for RFC: get_class_constants()
From: ingwie2000@googlemail.com (Kevin Ingwersen)

Hi!

I don=92t know much about RFC=92s yet - but I would totally vote for =
that. There are many use cases for that function, and it wouldn=92t =
break anything BC related too.

Kind regards,
Ingwie
Am 14.12.2013 um 01:28 schrieb Stefan Neufeind <neufeind@php.net>:

> Hi,
>=20
> following the howto for RFCs and since this would be my first one, I'd
> like to ask for your thoughts if such an RFC might find approval. If
> yes, I'll be happy to work on it.
>=20
> Proposal: Create a function get_class_constants()
>=20
> It would be similar to get_class_methods() and get_class_vars().
>=20
> Currently the same behavious is only possible by the help of =
reflection,
> which due to the nature of reflection takes a bit more =
work/cpu-cycles.
>=20
>  $reflection =3D new \ReflectionClass($class);
>  $constants =3D $reflection->getConstants();
>=20
>=20
> Kind regards,
> Stefan
>=20
> --=20
> PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
>=20