Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:70550
Return-Path: <mike.php.net@gmail.com>
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 31720 invoked from network); 9 Dec 2013 14:39:29 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1)
  by localhost with SMTP; 9 Dec 2013 14:39:29 -0000
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=mike.php.net@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=mike.php.net@gmail.com; sender-id=pass
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 74.125.83.46 as permitted sender)
X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: mike.php.net@gmail.com
X-Host-Fingerprint: 74.125.83.46 mail-ee0-f46.google.com  
Received: from [74.125.83.46] ([74.125.83.46:43994] helo=mail-ee0-f46.google.com)
	by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP
	id 7A/70-28714-F16D5A25 for <internals@lists.php.net>; Mon, 09 Dec 2013 09:39:28 -0500
Received: by mail-ee0-f46.google.com with SMTP id d49so1593254eek.19
        for <internals@lists.php.net>; Mon, 09 Dec 2013 06:39:24 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to:references
         :content-type:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=rD5sY9hvRs+h+iGWpibSCXF/wUqJPvlXzBQApChMvSc=;
        b=aRbc6V3unQDvXGgdmIzvOgq8PZ7i7j8GgxT20KxAX6QGziiURXuolvMJ+INr6kwDza
         CVywFoZwuGg/PMdDWhyCo6tMcvFF+/RtGikg4uYqh9u7+JuXJL+zi2N8dsRl/wGhtC75
         qVLlWtAcJBlFlk9Txf1bstcdtFYMPbYjYAH0o8KgHvCInGf1AvVPnKHm6pefrLWMB5sI
         N0mWqAYCxiFgjvNqVImk6ynJ2SV8yyUkg1dKiw1pPT2kVRdK30+RqiBv9oiwhvcGoqr4
         4A/Olfl7LfSP0jsbBLJQ6AWqTeGpxlszxDDrl6bKe/rr2u+puSuUZM6f26W13fyin3vg
         DNHA==
X-Received: by 10.14.108.6 with SMTP id p6mr12834206eeg.31.1386599964733;
        Mon, 09 Dec 2013 06:39:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.120] (178-18-170-101.customer.bnet.at. [178.18.170.101])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id a51sm29483334eeh.8.2013.12.09.06.39.23
        for <multiple recipients>
        (version=TLSv1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
        Mon, 09 Dec 2013 06:39:24 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <1386599962.9685.6.camel@smugmug>
To: Ferenc Kovacs <tyra3l@gmail.com>
Cc: Julien Pauli <jpauli@php.net>, Adam Harvey <aharvey@php.net>, Yasuo
 Ohgaki <yohgaki@ohgaki.net>, "internals@lists.php.net"
 <internals@lists.php.net>,  Michael Wallner <mike@php.net>, Ryan McCue
 <lists@rotorised.com>
Date: Mon, 09 Dec 2013 15:39:22 +0100
In-Reply-To: <CAH-PCH4k4_Ya9PQ8rCZKiih80HRaurd318JiNOuRgdqn4w1_sQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: 
	<CALJZF3hPY01c9EoVg3HYZec8TzuKwNkxZQvE58mtwh-WouUJfQ@mail.gmail.com>
	 <CAH-PCH6PQoeEvFh=7+4h8dMKST0kYjAG6aHQCXV4wLdz0y47yg@mail.gmail.com>
	 <CALJZF3ipd-Rxa5aiewVCJSgkss3c7N9YJhPXYWyF9T3e0jr8mg@mail.gmail.com>
	 <5293E54F.9060604@rotorised.com>
	 <CAH-PCH78NAKrOB8q9t9oW3V-+UMrHmEqsXbVucA3UZ2=N3FKjg@mail.gmail.com>
	 <CALJZF3ihrvfUoMkDp_b6gHSuSe8R6QwKVxbPkveMRb9R8moNHQ@mail.gmail.com>
	 <CAH-PCH55JDUOgAZ0GPz8aCiRAoJKqpVjNeo4dvmTTxk095Ra1Q@mail.gmail.com>
	 <CALJZF3iRhvm-6vJi1v+Hu4bFtbTi4Y4iwA7+HcQ0HZgd90gsHw@mail.gmail.com>
	 <1385628146.16543.0.camel@smugmug>
	 <CAH-PCH5uNgdNMVF1yY8gLUAebyS_zcQF1VFM5Bi5KqqhTmsMYw@mail.gmail.com>
	 <1385969508.2637.3.camel@smugmug>
	 <CAH-PCH6hqA0E3Fyet+ZH1C_4oEYMF-oY6k-D_uTWfmBZRLH+Ew@mail.gmail.com>
	 <CAH-PCH7gvcT6subB_N43vh0BBJrHR-WJDrzqk7FpfsOLAk9ZWA@mail.gmail.com>
	 <CAH-PCH4k4_Ya9PQ8rCZKiih80HRaurd318JiNOuRgdqn4w1_sQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Mailer: Evolution 3.10.2 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [RFC] Slim POST data (was: PHP-5.6 and
 $HTTP_RAW_POST_DATA)
From: mike.php.net@gmail.com (Mike)

On Mon, 2013-12-09 at 15:17 +0100, Ferenc Kovacs wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> On Sat, Dec 7, 2013 at 8:39 AM, Ferenc Kovacs <tyra3l@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>                 
>                         
>                         > I think it would make sense, to have an RFC
>                         for 5.6 about introducing
>                         > the new stream, the new ini option and and
>                         how does it keeps userland
>                         > BC while providing a way to opt-in for the
>                         performance gain, and that
>                         > it introduces an E_DEPRECATED so we can
>                         remove the ini and the raw
>                         > post global variable in the next major
>                         version.
>                         
>                         
>                         I think we cannot add E_DEPRECATED to the
>                         INI-setting unless we make its
>                         default -1... which breaks BC :p
>                         
>                         Also, I think two RFCs would be quite much,
>                         but I already gave up my
>                         renitency.
>                 
>                 
>                 we could emmit the error from populate_raw_post_data
>                 in main/php_content_types.c, telling people that the
>                 auto population of $HTTP_RAW_POST_DATA along with the
>                 use of always_populate_raw_post_data will go away, and
>                 they should set always_populate_raw_post_data to -1
>                 and populate that variable for themself if their want
>                 to be forward compatible (and silence the E_DEPRECATED
>                 messages).
>                 
>                 
>                 
>         
>         
>         Hi,
>         
>         
>         Any update on this?
>         I would be ok to merge with the PR in the current form, as it
>         resolves the BC issue, but if we want to remove the INI
>         setting in the future, then adding the E_DEPRECATED would be
>         important step.
>         

Ok, I'll change that and open for votes then!

Thanks,
Mike