Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:70525 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 18197 invoked from network); 7 Dec 2013 22:28:46 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 7 Dec 2013 22:28:46 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=adam@adamharvey.name; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=adam@adamharvey.name; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain adamharvey.name designates 209.85.213.182 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: adam@adamharvey.name X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.213.182 mail-ig0-f182.google.com Received: from [209.85.213.182] ([209.85.213.182:58039] helo=mail-ig0-f182.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 2B/62-01020-D11A3A25 for ; Sat, 07 Dec 2013 17:28:46 -0500 Received: by mail-ig0-f182.google.com with SMTP id c10so411128igq.3 for ; Sat, 07 Dec 2013 14:28:43 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=adamharvey.name; s=google; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=vcJFIuRdFcmC/DDMo/SEtyywaXddjXaFnQXNT61P1oE=; b=LilIb8qPUY18nAv0t51N9943UDPxIYG+zXEyRBxN9jlM/RQ3UDfAcdUSmYt/FoJkPi pI74lhOcxuwI2wRy+vXFd+hYGVvfVHCuHkxASmJjU4OVXQdeCrCAhrAFqBJ0XtazPUQG eBRnoaq3NeqIbEg4xjFW6begI/CvPsUcjJhkA= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=vcJFIuRdFcmC/DDMo/SEtyywaXddjXaFnQXNT61P1oE=; b=EtNMAAXYYIxiH+omP4Qgpf1QRE2bozd6RwXE6LZIgviIxO9KtSws8mq0zBj/i99wpr Tel4bbQClvSgxxdJ9bwEiaqHvkurJYuUPXnvCyTckLkv31eyGNqcjeq5YQcSznk1WBVb XiejDwQ6ct06fEmb9EcUfIXJ6C3kB5X9eHiRqF15h+J1obc1HZbLBUt/F/+IEg8Jp2Fo BdAixrkEePnw6KORWTM4IctdO5PY9tpuj3htybx0A8OsNkImS6d3dswyM+XoWzLRC/79 YMwdc9vwsY20Ns948i53FDAKEYjyuvbCy3dfYbgvDae/f2WFN2smBxkne7hGrpmamcf4 4GEQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQm7GjZI3hQ0o0hEEneVDGs9qgzh6JgoJyl7w+3zdBmvz0YYzsYkv0ZHTb+2bJLSnFcUuxUk X-Received: by 10.50.164.196 with SMTP id ys4mr9188825igb.35.1386455323445; Sat, 07 Dec 2013 14:28:43 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: adam@adamharvey.name Received: by 10.42.206.208 with HTTP; Sat, 7 Dec 2013 14:28:23 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <52A39CB7.1090506@ajf.me> References: <52A39CB7.1090506@ajf.me> Date: Sat, 7 Dec 2013 14:28:23 -0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: IbmddOrvQWWgpg1VOKokDGtNaaI Message-ID: To: Andrea Faulds Cc: Nikita Popov , PHP internals Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [VOTE] Allowing use of exceptions in the engine From: aharvey@php.net (Adam Harvey) On 7 December 2013 14:09, Andrea Faulds wrote: > On 07/12/13 21:47, Adam Harvey wrote: >> To be clear: I've voted -1 for exactly this reason, and this reason >> alone. I don't think implementing this piecemeal (without the >> E_RECOVERABLE_ERROR changes) is the right way to go =E2=80=94 I would pr= efer >> to have the whole thing as part of a 6.0 release, rather than >> potentially confusing users with a partial implementation. >> > > Maybe I'm misunderstanding you here, but if you don't want it piecemeal, > surely just vote "Yes"? Or are you saying you want it in 6.0, and also th= at > it shouldn't be piecemeal? I guess I explained that badly. :) The latter: I want it in 6.0, and don't think it should be piecemeal. Adam